Hyper-dispensationalism

The Myth of “Two Gospels”: The Gospel of Paul vs the Gospel of Jesus, A Biblical and Theological Critique – By Miguel Hayworth

In every generation, the Church must contend not only with opposition from outside, but with distortion from within. One such claim is that Scripture teaches two gospels one preached by Jesus Christ to Israel, and another revealed later to Apostle Paul for the Gentiles. While this may appear to honour “right division,” it ultimately fractures the unity of Scripture, separating Christ from His apostles and diminishing the authority of His own words. The New Testament, however, speaks with one voice: one gospel, one Saviour, and one way of salvation for both Jew and Gentile. This work seeks to examine that claim and to reaffirm the consistent, unified message of the gospel as revealed in Scripture.

Hyper-Dispensationalism (Ultra-Dispensationalism): A Critical Examination – John Hayworth

Introduction Hyper-dispensationalism, sometimes referred to as Ultra-Dispensationalism, is a theological system that extends the distinctions found in dispensational thought in a highly restrictive way. While traditional dispensationalism recognises a distinction between Israel and the Church and affirms progressive revelation, hyper-dispensationalism pushes these divisions much further often to the point of separating New Testament teaching into fundamentally different programs. In its more developed forms, this system divides the message of Jesus Christ and the Twelve from that of Apostle Paul, arguing that they proclaimed different gospels for different audiences. As a result, significant portions of the Gospels and even parts of Acts are treated as not directly applicable to the Church today.