From Monotheism to Mysticism: An Analysis of Mutashabihat Questions 7–12 and the Early Theology of Ahmad al-Hassan

Posted on

Abdullah Hashem Aba Al-Sadiq,
Jan. 1, 2025 By AimanAbir18plus –
Own work, CC BY 4.0, Wikipedia
BACK

Introduction

One of the most revealing documents from the early Ahmad al-Hassan movement is Mutashabihat Questions 7–12, circulated among followers in 2011 on the Hashem Studios Board.

At first glance the material appears to be a collection of theological questions and answers. However, a closer examination reveals a pattern that would later become increasingly important within the movement: the elevation of Muhammad, Ali, Fatima, and ultimately the divinely appointed representative to an extraordinary status that goes far beyond mainstream Islamic understandings.

The significance of these teachings is not merely theological. They illustrate how authority is gradually transferred away from established religious scholarship and toward a claimant who alone possesses the “correct” interpretation of hidden truths.

Question 7: Did Abraham Call the Stars His Lord?

The Qur’an records Abraham saying:

“This is my Lord.”

Traditional Islamic scholarship generally understands this as either:

  • A rhetorical argument against idol worship.
  • A stage in Abraham’s reasoning before receiving divine certainty.

Ahmad al-Hassan rejects this interpretation entirely.

Instead he argues that Abraham was not looking at physical stars at all.

He writes:

“When he saw the light of the Riser he said: He is my Lord.”

And:

“When he saw the light of Ali he said: He is my Lord.”

And:

“When he saw the light of Muhammad he said: He is my Lord.”

This is a remarkable reinterpretation.

The biblical and Qur’anic narrative is transformed into a mystical vision in which Abraham encounters the lights of future religious figures.

Why This Matters

This interpretation fundamentally changes the focus of the passage.

The traditional lesson concerns worshipping God alone.

The new lesson becomes recognition of sacred personalities whose light is so overwhelming that even Abraham allegedly struggled to distinguish them from God.

The practical result is the elevation of certain human figures to an extraordinary spiritual status.

Question 8: Muhammad, Ali and Fatima as Manifestations of Divine Attributes

Perhaps the most significant statement appears in Question 8.

Ahmad al-Hassan writes:

“Muhammad is the manifestation of Allah.”

“Ali is the manifestation of Al-Rahman.”

“Fatima is the manifestation of Al-Raheem.”

These are not merely descriptions of piety.

They assign cosmic functions to specific individuals.

Muhammad becomes the manifestation of Allah.

Ali becomes the manifestation of Divine Mercy.

Fatima becomes the manifestation of Divine Compassion.

He further states:

“If it wasn’t for Muhammad the skies and earths would not have been created.”

“If it wasn’t for Ali, Muhammad would not have been known.”

“If it wasn’t for Fatima, Muhammad and Ali would not have been created.”

Theological Concerns

Islam historically distinguishes sharply between:

  • The Creator.
  • The creation.

Even highly honoured prophets remain servants of God.

The language used here moves significantly beyond ordinary prophetic honour and introduces an increasingly mystical cosmology in which creation itself appears dependent upon these figures.

This later becomes highly relevant when examining the development of AROPL theology.

Question 9: The Three Pillars of Guidance

Ahmad al-Hassan states:

“The pillars of guidance are three and no other.”

He identifies them as:

  • Muhammad
  • Ali
  • Fatima

He further states:

“Muhammad is the manifestation of Allah.”

“Ali is the manifestation of Al-Rahman.”

“Fatima is the manifestation of Al-Raheem.”

Notice the pattern.

The same theological framework is repeated repeatedly.

This repetition is important because repetition reinforces belief.

The reader is gradually taught to think of these figures not simply as servants of God but as cosmic manifestations through whom divine realities are expressed.

Question 10: Ali and the Veil of Divinity

Question 10 contains one of the most startling passages.

Discussing a statement attributed to Ali, Ahmad al-Hassan writes:

“The Prince of Believers was talking about the veil that covered Divinity from him.”

He then argues:

“If the veil was uncovered for Ali, Ali would not even have existed.”

This is not ordinary Islamic language.

The discussion moves into a mystical framework where Ali is portrayed as standing on the threshold of divine reality itself.

Why This Is Significant

Mainstream Islamic theology consistently maintains a distinction between:

  • God.
  • Human beings.

Even prophets do not share in divinity.

Yet throughout this section the language repeatedly approaches the boundary between honouring a servant of God and attributing divine characteristics to human figures.

Question 11: The Hidden Meaning of the Qur’anic Letters

The disconnected letters at the beginning of Qur’anic chapters have fascinated scholars for centuries.

Traditional scholars generally acknowledge uncertainty concerning their precise meaning.

Ahmad al-Hassan, however, claims certainty.

He writes:

“Meem is Muhammad.”

“Lam is Ali.”

“Alif is Fatima.”

He further claims:

“These letters are the pinnacle of the Qur’an.”

And:

“The Greatest Name is formed from them.”

Exclusive Interpretation

Notice the pattern again.

Traditional uncertainty is replaced by exclusive certainty.

The mystery is solved.

The hidden meaning is revealed.

And the revelation comes through the claimant.

This becomes a recurring feature throughout the movement’s literature.

Question 12: The Names Taught to Adam

Question 12 addresses the names taught to Adam.

Ahmad al-Hassan writes:

“Muhammad and the family of Muhammad, the Prophets and the Messengers, they are names of Allah on earth.”

Again the language is extraordinary.

Rather than merely representing God or serving God, these figures are described as manifestations of the divine names themselves.

The Pattern Becomes Clear

Across Questions 7–12 the same themes emerge repeatedly:

  • Sacred personalities possess cosmic significance.
  • Hidden meanings are accessible only through special interpretation.
  • Traditional readings are replaced by new esoteric explanations.
  • The claimant becomes the key to unlocking those mysteries.

The Psychological Function of Hidden Knowledge

One of the most important aspects of these writings is not the individual interpretations themselves.

It is the repeated claim to possess knowledge unavailable to ordinary scholars.

Followers are taught that:

  • The surface meaning is insufficient.
  • Traditional scholars misunderstood the text.
  • Hidden meanings exist beneath the obvious reading.
  • The claimant alone can reveal them.

This creates a powerful dependency structure.

The believer increasingly relies upon the movement’s interpreter rather than the text itself.

The Road Toward Later Developments

Looking back with hindsight, these early writings contain ideas that later became increasingly important.

The pattern is visible:

Step 1

Traditional interpretations are questioned.

Step 2

Hidden meanings are introduced.

Step 3

Sacred figures receive increasingly exalted descriptions.

Step 4

Exclusive access to those meanings belongs to the claimant.

Step 5

Followers become dependent upon the claimant’s interpretations.

Once this framework is accepted, further claims become much easier to introduce.

Conclusion

Mutashabihat Questions 7–12 reveal much more than unusual theological speculation.

They demonstrate an emerging system of authority built upon:

  • Esoteric interpretation.
  • Exclusive knowledge.
  • Elevated spiritual personalities.
  • Reliance upon a divinely guided interpreter.

The most important issue is not whether a particular interpretation is unusual.

The deeper issue is whether believers are encouraged to test teachings against Scripture and established scholarship, or whether they are encouraged to accept increasingly extraordinary claims because they originate from a claimant presented as possessing unique divine insight.

These early writings provide an important window into how religious authority was gradually centralised within the movement and why later theological developments became possible.

Archive Source

Hashem Studios Board Archive (2011):

https://web.archive.org/web/20120103114120/http://hashemstudios-board.com/viewtopic.php?f=118&t=5439