A Gospel of Amnesia: Why Abdullah Hashem’s "Paradise" is a Spiritual Prison

Abdullah Hashem Aba Al-Sadiq, Jan. 1, 2025 By AimanAbir18plus – Own work, CC BY 4.0, Wikipedia

In our mission at the UK Apologetics Library, we continue to expose the “Seventh Covenant” as a dangerous departure from divine truth. Today, we turn our analytical lens to Door Number Twenty of The Goal of the Wise

.In this chapter, Abdullah Hashem self-styled as “Aba Al-Sadiq” purports to provide a “glimpse of paradise” through the words of his Imam, Ahmed Al-Hassan. However, a line-by-line analysis of his claims reveals a calculated attempt to twist the words of Christ and replace the eternal hope of the Gospel with a carnal, hierarchical, and psychologically manipulative system.

1. The Rhetorical Trap: Claiming “Incompleteness” in Scripture

Hashem begins with a seemingly humble observation: that there are “surprisingly few descriptions of paradise” in the Torah, Gospels, and Qur’an. He quotes the Prophet Mohammed stating that God has prepared for the righteous what “no human heart can ever think of”.

The Deception: Hashem uses the “indescribable” nature of God’s glory as a pretext to inject his own vivid, unbiblical descriptions. By claiming previous scriptures are “incomplete” or removed from their “original context” , he positions his own book as the only “clarification” for a confused humanity. In reality, he is using the silence of scripture to fill the void with his own self-serving narratives. Page 242

2. Grounding Paradise in the Material World

Twisting the words of Jesus, Hashem cites a verse regarding a “paradise whose width is that of the sky and of the earth” to conclude that “Paradise is on the Earth”.

The Error: This terrestrial focus is a hallmark of Hashem’s “Divine Just State”. By grounding the afterlife in the physical world, he shifts the believer’s focus from a transcendent Creator to a physical realm where he and his “Imam” hold absolute authority. The Bible teaches that our citizenship is in heaven, yet Hashem seeks to bind his followers to a “mosquito’s back” his metaphor for the insignificance of our current reality while simultaneously promising a terrestrial kingdom.

3. The Blasphemy of the “Pyramid Hierarchy”

Perhaps the most carnal distortion in Door Twenty is the description of social and sexual order in the afterlife. Hashem describes paradise as a “pyramid hierarchy” where ranks are determined by one’s degree of submission.

The Distortion: He explicitly claims that higher-ranked individuals may have “intercourse with anyone… lower than his rank,” asserting that “jealousy doesn’t exist” to facilitate this system.
The Refutation: This is a direct affront to the words of Jesus in Matthew 22:30, which state that in the resurrection, we “neither marry nor are given in marriage.” Hashem is not describing a holy paradise; he is projecting worldly power dynamics and sexual exploitation into the eternal state to justify a cultic hierarchy.

4. “Paradisiacal Amnesia”: The Ultimate Tool of Control

To solve the “problem” of boredom over millions of years, Hashem introduces “Paradisiacal Amnesia,” claiming that residents of paradise will “forget every day” what they enjoyed.

The Psychological Prison: This doctrine mirrors Hashem’s leadership style on Earth, where he claims to have “erased the memories” of his closest followers. A paradise where your joy is reset and your identity is wiped daily is not a reward; it is a spiritual prison. It robs the believer of the “blessed hope” of growing intimacy with God, replacing it with a managed, repetitive experience.

5. Reincarnation as the “Secret” Judgment

Finally, Hashem uses this section to reinforce his doctrine of Raj’a (reincarnation). He claims that “we are right now in judgment” through our various incarnations and that one only reaches the “Day of Judgment” after their final physical life.

The Falsehood: This removes the biblical urgency of a single life and a final account before God. By claiming to be the “Judge” who can look at a face and determine a person’s “incarnation status,” Hashem usurps the role of the Most High.

The Soulmate Delusion: Deconstructing Abdullah Hashem’s Sexualized Afterlife

Soulmates in Paradise

The Reincarnation Trap: Undermining Eternal Unity

The Text: “If we incarnate many times and each time we marry a different person, which one are we with in paradise? … The Imam said, ‘Each person has a set number of incarnations and a set number of spouses… the soulmate is the person whose level of faith or degree is closest to their own.'”

The Analysis: Hashem uses the confusion of his own unbiblical “reincarnation” doctrine to create a problem that only he can solve. By teaching that we have multiple spouses across many lives, he destroys the sanctity of the “one flesh” union established by God. Page 242
The Refutation: The Bible is clear: “It is appointed for man to die once, and after that comes judgment” (Hebrews 9:27). There are no “multiple incarnations” or “rotations of spouses.” Hashem’s “soulmate” is not a divine gift, but a mathematical calculation based on “ranks” and “degrees”—a system that allows him to decide who belongs to whom.

The “Final Incarnation” and Cultic Control

The Text: “In their final incarnation they are married to each other… I asked, ‘Is a person’s soulmate created from him?’ The Imam said, ‘No, that is not necessarily the case.'”

The Analysis: This is the “hook” of the cult. By claiming that soulmates must be married in their “final incarnation,” Hashem places an immense psychological burden on his followers to find their “true” mate within the community. Notice how he detaches the soulmate from the biblical “rib of Adam” (creation from him), making the bond subject to “faith levels” rather than divine creation. Page 242
The Refutation: This doctrine is designed to break up existing families. If a follower believes their current spouse is not their “soulmate” of the same “rank,” they are encouraged to look toward the “final incarnation” marriage within the cult. This is a classic tactic of high-control groups to sever outside ties.

3. Gender Fluidity and Occult Transmigration

The Text: “I asked the Imam, ‘Can a man incarnate as a woman and a woman as a man…?’ The Imam said, ‘Yes, my son.'”

The Analysis: Hashem explicitly validates Al-Haft Al-Shareef, an occultic text that teaches the transmigration of souls across genders and even species (into animals or stones). Page 242
The Refutation: God created humanity “male and female” (Genesis 1:27). The idea of a soul hopping between genders across lifetimes is a Gnostic and pagan concept, not a Christian or Islamic one. It serves to deconstruct the God-given identity of the individual, making them a blank slate for the leader to redefine.

The Physicality of a Carnal Paradise

The Text: “I said, ‘Do we have physical bodies in paradise?’ The Imam replied, ‘Yes, son, we have bodies that are physical in paradise and appropriate for that world.'”

The Analysis: While the Bible promises a resurrected body, Hashem’s “physicality” is linked to his earlier claims in Door Twenty about “pyramid hierarchies” and “intercourse” with those of lower ranks. He isn’t describing a glorified body meant for the worship of God; he is describing a refined material body meant for carnal satisfaction. Page 242
The Refutation: Jesus explicitly refuted this in Matthew 22:30: “For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels in heaven.” Hashem’s “Imam” says the exact opposite, proving that he is not the “Spirit of Truth,” but a spirit of error.

The Text: “The names and images are not like they are now… People enter paradise as beautiful as they had faith in this world, their faith in the world determines their beauty in the hereafter.”

The Analysis: Hashem teaches that your very identity your name and your face is discarded upon entering his version of Paradise. In its place, you are given a “rank” of beauty based on your performance. This is a subtle but powerful psychological tool: it tells the follower that their current self is inadequate and that their “eternal beauty” is entirely dependent on how well they submit to the “Imam” today. Page 242
The Refutation: The Gospel teaches that we are known and loved by name. When Jesus was resurrected, He was recognizable to His disciples (John 20:16). Our identity is not a reward to be earned through “levels of faith”; it is a gift from the Creator. Hashem’s teaching turns the afterlife into a cosmic “beauty pageant” where the most “faithful” (read: the most submissive to the cult) are rewarded with physical superiority.

A Salvation of Works, Not Grace

The Analysis: By claiming that “faith determines beauty,” Hashem is actually teaching a theology of Works. In his system, your status and appearance in the hereafter are a direct reflection of your performance in this life. This creates a hierarchy of “elite” believers who are more “beautiful” than others, fostering pride among the high-ranking and shame among the low-ranking. Page 242

The Refutation: This is the antithesis of the Message of Christ. The Bible teaches that “by grace you have been saved through faith… not a result of works, so that no one may boast” (Ephesians 2:8-9). In Hashem’s Paradise, there is plenty of room for boasting, as your very face becomes a badge of your spiritual “rank.” This is not the humility of the Kingdom of Heaven; it is the vanity of the world projected onto eternity.

The “Physical Body” Trap

The Text: “Yes, son, we have bodies that are physical in paradise and appropriate for that world.”

The Analysis: Why is Hashem so insistent on the “physicality” of Paradise? Because his “Seventh Covenant” is a materialist religion. He needs Paradise to be physical so that his descriptions of “intercourse between ranks” and “earthly governments” (The Divine Just State) seem logical. Page 242
The Refutation: While Scripture speaks of a resurrected body, it is a glorified body one that is no longer subject to the carnal desires of the flesh. By emphasizing a “physicality” that mirrors this world’s beauty standards and social hierarchies, Hashem proves he is not looking toward the Most High, but is merely trying to rebuild an earthly kingdom with himself at the top.

The Citation vs. The Reality

Hashem’s Claim: He uses this citation to support the idea that “no eye has ever seen” paradise because it is a place of “ranks,” “degrees,” and “multiple incarnations” where “soulmates” are reunited based on their level of faith.

The Reality of Vol. 8, p. 92: Bihar Al-Anwar (Oceans of Light) is a massive 110-volume encyclopedia by the 17th-century scholar Al-Majlisi.

Volume 8 is specifically titled “The Book of Justice and Destiny” (or in some editions, part of the sections on Resurrection, Paradise, and Hell).
Page 92 (and the surrounding chapters) does indeed contain the famous Hadith Qudsi: “I have prepared for My righteous servants what no eye has seen, no ear has heard, and has never crossed the heart of man.”

The Deception: Hashem takes a universal statement about the grandeur of God’s reward and uses it as a “blank check” to fill in his own bizarre details. He argues that because it is “beyond description,” his own descriptions of pyramid sex hierarchies, memory-wiping (amnesia), and gender-swapping incarnations must be the “secret truth” that was hidden.

2. Twisting “No Eye Has Seen” into “Anything Goes”

Hashem’s logic is a classic cult tactic:

Cite a real scripture that says God’s reward is mysterious.
Claim that all traditional understandings are therefore wrong.
Insert your own carnal fantasies as the “newly revealed” mystery.

While Bihar Al-Anwar records traditions of paradise having levels of spiritual proximity to the Ahlul Bayt, it never supports Hashem’s claim that these ranks allow for “intercourse with anyone of a lower rank.” By citing a reputable source for a common quote, he hopes you won’t notice that the rest of his “revelations” about ranked sexual access are completely absent from Al-Majlisi’s work.

**3. The Reincarnation Lie (Raj’a vs. Transmigration)**

Hashem uses this section to push the idea of “multiple incarnations” and “soulmate degrees.”

What Bihar Al-Anwar actually says: Al-Majlisi does discuss Raj’a (The Return), but in Shia theology, this is a miraculous return to life of specific individuals at the time of the Mahdi not a pagan cycle of multiple lives where souls hop from body to body, gender to gender, or animal to stone.
Hashem’s Twist: He hijacks the term Raj’a and infects it with Gnostic transmigration. By citing Vol. 8, he tries to make his “Soul Family” and “Final Incarnation” doctrines look like standard Shia theology. In reality, Al-Majlisi would have considered Hashem’s teachings on gender-swapping souls to be pure heresy (Ghulat).

4. The “Samarat” Fabrication

In this section, Hashem compares paradise to the “World of Samarat.”

The Analysis: You will search the 110 volumes of Bihar Al-Anwar in vain for this “World of Samarat.” This is a term Hashem has invented (or borrowed from obscure occultism) to create a sense of “exclusive knowledge.” By placing it alongside a real citation (Vol. 8, p. 92), he tricks the reader into believing it is all part of the same divine tradition.

The Carnal Pyramid: Abdullah Hashem’s Sexualization of the Divine Afterlife

Reducing Scripture to Materialism (Laptops and Fancy Cars)

The Text: “The Qur’an… says it is filled with fruits, meat, wine, and honey. It is because people in those times wished for those things. If the Qur’an was to come down in today’s time… it would describe paradise as having laptops, phones, and fancy cars…” Page 243

The Analysis: Hashem reduces the symbolic and spiritual descriptions of Divine reward to mere “consumer trends.” By suggesting that God’s Word is simply a reflection of human technology, he undermines the eternal, unchanging nature of Divine Revelation.
The Refutation: God’s descriptions of Paradise are meant to convey spiritual satisfaction and peace, not to keep pace with the latest iPhone. By making Paradise about “laptops and fancy cars,” Hashem reveals that his “Seventh Covenant” is not a spiritual path, but a materialistic fantasy designed to appeal to worldly desires.

The Corruption of the Afterlife: Sex as the Ultimate Goal

The Text: “One of the things that humans always think about and wish for is sex. For that reason, paradise was described as having Houris and young boys… [The boys] are for the men and the women… if a man wants to be with a man, he can be.” Page 243

The Analysis: Hashem explicitly states that “the everlasting boys” (mentioned in the Qur’an as servants) are actually “for sex” for both genders. This is a massive departure from traditional Christian and Islamic morality.
The Refutation: True Paradise is defined by the Beatiﬁc Vision—the sight of God. Jesus taught in Matthew 22:30 that in the resurrection, we are “like angels,” transcending physical marriage and carnal lust. Hashem, however, turns the afterlife into a playground for every impulse, essentially claiming that God rewards the faithful by indulging the very passions they were taught to master on Earth.

The Abolition of Right and Wrong

The Text: “In paradise there is no right and wrong, hallal and haram, allowed and forbidden. The rules for the people of paradise are not like the rules for the people of the Earth…” Page 243

The Analysis: This is the core of Hashem’s “Antinomian” (lawless) heresy. He argues that the moral nature of God changes depending on the “world” one is in.
The Refutation: God is the same yesterday, today, and forever. Holiness is not a set of temporary “rules” for Earth; it is the very nature of the Divine. If “right and wrong” disappear in Paradise, then the Paradise Hashem describes is not the Kingdom of God, but a realm of moral chaos.

The “Pyramid Hierarchy” of Sexual Access

The Text: “A person at a certain degree may have intercourse with anyone… that is lower than his rank but cannot have intercourse with someone of a higher rank unless that person… wants to.” Page 244

The Analysis: This is perhaps the most disturbing revelation in the book. Hashem describes a “pyramid hierarchy” where those of “higher rank” have a sexual right to those of “lower rank.”
The Refutation: This is not a description of Heaven; it is a blueprint for cultic exploitation. By creating a system where “rank” dictates sexual access, Hashem creates an incentive for followers to climb his organizational ladder. It turns the “believers” into a commodity for those at the top. True faith treats every soul as equal before God; Hashem treats souls as objects to be used by their “superiors.”

5. “Jealousy Doesn’t Exist”: The Erasure of Human Emotion

The Text: “I said, ‘So it is like a pyramid hierarchy? But don’t the spouses of those individuals become jealous and sad?’ The Imam said, ‘Jealousy doesn’t exist there… neither does sadness.'” Page 244

The Refutation: This is a classic gaslighting technique. It suggests that if you find this “pyramid” offensive or hurtful, it is only because you are “sad” or “jealous” emotions that supposedly won’t exist in his version of truth. It justifies the breaking of marital bonds and the violation of others by promising a future where no one is “allowed” to feel hurt by it.
The Analysis: When challenged on the obvious cruelty of his “intercourse hierarchy,” Hashem simply claims that God will remove the human capacity for jealousy.

The “Paradise” described on Page 243 of The Goal of the Wise is a place where sex is the currency, hierarchy is the law, and morality is abolished. It is a carnal, earthly kingdom projected onto the stars.

The Prison of the Mind: Why Abdullah Hashem’s “Paradisiacal Amnesia” is a Nightmare, Not a Reward

Pages 244 and 245 of The Goal of the Wise. Here, Abdullah Hashem (Aba Al-Sadiq) introduces a doctrine so psychologically damaging that even the narrator of his own book admits it sounds “frightening.”

By proposing “Paradisiacal Amnesia” the daily erasing of a person’s memories Hashem reveals that his “Seventh Covenant” doesn’t offer eternal life; it offers eternal oblivion.

The Erasure of Human Love and History

The Text: “I said, ‘So I will not remember our memories of life together with loved ones?’ The Imam… said, ‘No son, it will be as if you are meeting them for the first time.'” Page 244

The Refutation: The Bible teaches that our experiences and our witness follow us. In the afterlife, the “tears are wiped away” (Revelation 21:4), not because we are lobotomized into forgetting our lives, but because God heals the pain. Hashem’s “solution” to suffering is to delete the person. This is not divine healing; it is spiritual erasure.

The Analysis: Hashem argues that we must forget our lives on Earth because remembering them would make us unhappy. This effectively erases the history of the soul. If you do not remember the trials you overcame, the people you loved, or the mercy God showed you, then the “you” in Paradise is not really you at all.

The Daily Memory Wipe: “In Order That Boredom Does Not Occur”

The Text: “Is it true that every day the human forgets the day before…? The Imam answered, ‘Yes, in order that boredom does not occur.'” Page 244

The Analysis: This is the most chilling claim in the book. Hashem suggests that the only way God can keep people happy for a million years is to wipe their memory every 24 hours. This turns Paradise into a spiritual version of the film Groundhog Day.
The Refutation: This doctrine is a direct admission that Hashem’s “Paradise” is shallow. If his version of Heaven is so boring that it requires forced amnesia to remain tolerable, then it is clearly not the presence of an infinite, glorious God. True eternal life is a constant deepening of knowledge and love, not a repetitive cycle of “forgetting what you enjoyed.”

The Cultic “Gaslighting” of the Narrator

The Text: “I said, ‘My Father… I have not found in the description of paradise anything beautiful, all of it is frightening, from states of constant amnesia to having sex all the time…’ The Imam smiled and said, ‘No son, you are wrong… do not think with a human mind.'”

The Analysis: Notice the interaction here. The narrator correctly identifies that this “Paradise” of ranked sex and daily memory loss is “frightening.” The “Imam” responds by telling him he is “wrong” and that his “human mind” is incapable of understanding.
The Refutation: This is classic cultic gaslighting. When the follower’s God-given conscience and logic scream that something is wrong, the leader tells them to stop thinking and just submit. By dismissing the narrator’s valid fear as “human projection,” Hashem shuts down critical thinking and demands blind acceptance of a nightmare.

The “Gay Paradise” Contradiction

The Text: “I said, ‘But why does it [homosexuality] exist in paradise?’ The Imam said, ‘We are talking about this world and not paradise.'”

The Analysis: Hashem creates a massive moral schism. He admits that homosexuality is “forbidden” in his current jurisprudence but claims it is a “wish granted” in Paradise. This suggests that “Right and Wrong” are not reflections of God’s character, but arbitrary rules that can be flipped at will.
The Refutation: This moral inconsistency is the hallmark of a false prophet. If God finds an act “unacceptable” on Earth, He does not provide it as a “reward” in Heaven. Hashem is simply pandering to modern social debates while maintaining a secretive, lawless “Paradise” where anything goes, further undermining the holiness of the Most High.

Abdullah Hashem’s “Paradise” is a place where you possess a body for ranked sex, but no mind to remember your spouse. You are beautiful based on your cultic rank, but you forget your own name and your children’s faces every morning.

At the UK Apologetics Library, we ask: What is the point of a reward if the “you” who earned it is deleted every day?

This is not the Gospel. This is a mechanism of control designed to make followers comfortable with losing their identity to a leader. Abdullah Hashem is not a messenger of light; he is a merchant of shadows. True Paradise is the eternal, conscious, and joyous recognition of the King of Kings where we shall “know fully, even as we are fully known” (1 Corinthians 13:12).

The Linguistic Deception: Abdullah Hashem’s 2050 False Prophecy and the Hijacking of Arabic

Pages 245 and 246 of The Goal of the Wise. Here, Abdullah Hashem (Aba Al-Sadiq) attempts to solidify his authority by making a bold “prophetic” claim regarding the English language and the year 2050. This section is a textbook example of how cult leaders use linguistic preference and dated predictions to manufacture a sense of “insider knowledge.”

By breaking down this text, we see how Hashem contradicts himself and uses the Qur’an to distract from his own worldly ambitions.

The Flattery of the “Easiest Language”

The Text: “The entire world shall speak the easiest language on the face of the earth, English… It is a smooth, lovely, and beautiful language.” Page 245

The Analysis: Hashem, an Egyptian-American, is pandering to his Western audience. By declaring English the current global lingua franca of commerce and the internet as the “divinely chosen” language for the world, he isn’t prophesying; he is simply observing a modern geopolitical trend and slapping a “divine” label on it.
The Refutation: God is not a respecter of persons or languages (Acts 10:34). The idea that one language is “smoother” or “easier” than another is a subjective human opinion, not a divine decree. Hashem is using linguistic flattery to make his Western followers feel that their culture is the “pinnacle” of his new religion.

The 2050 Prophecy: A Countdown to Disappointment

The Text: “When shall that happen…? The Imam said, ‘By the year 2050 approximately, so about three decades from now.’”

The Analysis: False prophets love dates that are far enough away to avoid immediate scrutiny but close enough to create urgency. By setting a date (2050), Hashem creates a “ticking clock” for his followers. This is a common tactic used by groups like the Jehovah’s Witnesses or the Millerites, who all eventually faced the “Great Disappointment” when their dates passed.
The Refutation: Jesus was clear: “But about that day or hour no one knows” (Matthew 24:36). Any man who puts a date on a global “divine shift” is operating outside of God’s established order. Hashem’s 2050 prediction is not a revelation; it is a gamble on future history designed to keep his current followers tethered to his timeline.

The “Paradise Language” Contradiction

The Text: “I love the Arabic language very much, because it is, as you know, the language of the people in paradise.”

The Analysis: There is a glaring logical inconsistency here. If Arabic is the language of Paradise, why would God’s “Seventh Covenant” prioritize English as the global language for the faithful on Earth? Hashem is trying to play both sides: he appeals to traditional Muslims by praising Arabic, while simultaneously appealing to the West by elevating English.
The Refutation: This “double-speak” shows that Hashem’s teachings are not a cohesive divine plan, but a patched-together narrative intended to recruit from different backgrounds. A true messenger of the Most High does not need to balance linguistic preferences to keep his audience happy.

Misusing the Qur’an: The Al-Imran Verse 93 Hijack

The Text: Hashem quotes Chapter 3 (Al-Imran), Verse 93: “All food was lawful for the Children of Israel, except what Israel made unlawful for himself before the Torah was revealed. Say, ‘Bring then the Torah and read it, if you are truthful.’”

The Analysis: Why does he quote this here? In the context of his book, he uses this verse to argue that “rules” (like language or social laws) are temporary and can be changed. He is attempting to build a bridge between his “lawless” Paradise (where nothing is haram) and the legalism of the past.
The Refutation: This is a gross out-of-context application. Verse 3:93 is about specific dietary laws and the challenges faced by the Children of Israel; it is not a “blank check” for a modern leader to declare that English will rule the world or that moral laws will vanish in 2050. Hashem quotes the verse to look “scholarly,” but he ignores its actual meaning to promote his own agenda.

Abdullah Hashem’s linguistic “revelations” are nothing more than a mixture of modern observation and cultic date-setting. He praises English because it is convenient for his recruitment and sets a date of 2050 to give his movement a sense of destiny.

At the UK Apologetics Library, we stand firm: The Word of God is not bound to a single human language or a 30-year deadline. Abdullah Hashem is not the “Riser” explaining the heavens; he is a man using the prestige of Arabic and the dominance of English to build an earthly empire. Do not be deceived by his “smooth” words the True Gospel is spoken in the language of the heart, and it does not expire in 2050.

The Bestiary of the Soul: Refuting Abdullah Hashem’s Occultic Transmigration of Animals

Page 246 for the UK Apologetics Library, we encounter one of the most bizarre and doctrinally dangerous claims in Abdullah Hashem’s The Goal of the Wise. Here, Hashem purporting to speak for his “Imam” claims that animals can “level up” into humans through multiple incarnations to reach Paradise.

This is not the theology of the Most High; it is a blend of ancient paganism and occultic transmigration designed to blur the lines between God’s unique creation of man and the rest of the natural world.

The theology presented by Abdullah Hashem is a clear departure from the absolute sovereignty and creative order of the Most High, functioning instead as a syncretic blend of ancient paganism and occultic transmigration. By teaching that animals can “evolve” into humans and that humans can be “demoted” into beasts based on merit, Hashem resurrects the Pythagorean myth of metempsychosis and the Gnostic “Great Chain of Being,” both of which were historically rejected by the Prophets. This doctrine is strategically designed to blur the sacred lines between humanity created uniquely in the Imago Dei (Image of God)—and the rest of the natural world, reducing the human soul to a mere migratory energy. Ultimately, this replaces the biblical and Quranic truth of a final, singular judgment with a chaotic “recycling program” of souls, serving as a psychological tool to keep followers in a state of fear and subservience to a leader who claims to control their very biological destiny.

The Pagan Myth of Transmigration

The Text: “The Hoopoe bird of Solomon… and other than him… returned many times and in many incarnations… as human beings, my son. This is out of dignity for them so that they may enter paradise.” Page 246

The Analysis: Hashem claims that animals who were “good” in scripture have been reincarnated as humans. This is the classic doctrine of Metempsychosis (the movement of souls between species), which is central to many pagan religions but has no place in the Abrahamic faith.
The Refutation: God created humanity uniquely “in His own image” (Imago Dei). There is a fundamental ontological gap between an animal and a human. To suggest that a bird can “deserve” to become a human through performance is to strip humanity of its unique spiritual status and turn the soul into a migratory “energy” that hops from body to body.

The Threat of “Demotion”: Humans Becoming Animals

The Text: “Animals whose nafs is good deserve to come back as a human. Humans whose nafs is bad deserve to come back as an animal.” Page 246

The Analysis: This is the “stick” to go with the “carrot.” Hashem uses this doctrine to threaten his followers: if your “nafs” (carnal self) is bad, you might be demoted to an ant or a dog in your next life.
The Refutation: This is a tool of psychological terror. It forces the follower to constantly evaluate their “performance” under the leader’s gaze for fear of losing their humanity. The Bible teaches that man is a distinct creation; there is no scriptural evidence for a “demotion” into animality as a form of divine judgment. This is a fabrication used to keep cult members in a state of perpetual anxiety about their “level of faith.”

**The Misunderstanding of the Nafs and the Soul**

The Text: “An animal is created with a nafs and no soul, and an angel has a soul and no nafs, and a human being has both.” Page 246

The Analysis: Hashem attempts to sound scholarly by defining the nafs (soul/ego) and ruh (spirit), but he contradicts the very scriptures he claims to clarify. He suggests that by “passing through the human form,” an animal can eventually gain the “soul” it lacks to enter Paradise.
The Refutation: If an animal has no soul, as Hashem admits, then there is no “eternal self” to reincarnate into a human. You cannot have a “merit-based” transition from a soulless animal to a soulful human without a massive logical contradiction. This proves that Hashem is making up “spiritual laws” on the fly to satisfy the curiosity of his followers and to sound “revelatory.”

The “No Beasts in Paradise” Fallacy

The Text: “There are no beasts in paradise… they do not roam around in paradise in the images or forms of animals. Rather, they would first have to pass through the human form.” Page 246

The Analysis: Hashem claims that Paradise is exclusively human. If you want to see your beloved pet in the afterlife, Hashem’s answer is that they must first become a person, join his “Seventh Covenant,” and climb the “pyramid hierarchy.”
The Refutation: This is a direct contradiction to many spiritual traditions that see the animal kingdom as part of God’s peaceful restoration (Isaiah 11:6, “The wolf shall dwell with the lamb”). Hashem’s version of Paradise is a sterile, human-centric hierarchy where everything—including your pets—must conform to his “incarnation” system.

The Ultimate Blasphemy: Exposing the “God in Creation” Delusion and the False 313

Pages 246 and 247 for the UK Apologetics Library, we reach the peak of Abdullah Hashem’s deception. In this section, Hashem attempts to mask extreme blasphemy with a thin veil of “humility,” ultimately claiming that he (or his Imam) is “God in Creation.” Page 246

This is the ultimate goal of the “Seventh Covenant”: to lead the believer away from the transcendent Creator and toward the worship of a man. Let us break down this text and expose the spirit of pride lurking behind the words.

The “God in Creation” Blasphemy

The Text: “I said, ‘Glory be to God, but my Father, you are God in Creation, and you have no will except that it is God’s will, and you are Him and He is you.’” Page 246

The Analysis: This is the most dangerous statement in the entire book. Hashem explicitly claims a state of “oneness” with God that goes beyond any scriptural boundary. By saying “You are Him and He is you,” Hashem is promoting Incarnationalism (the belief that a man is God) and Pantheism, both of which are rejected by the Most High.
The Refutation: God is “The One, the Eternal Refuge. He neither begets nor is born, nor is there to Him any equivalent” (Qur’an 112). In the Bible, God declares, “I am the Lord, and there is no other; besides me there is no God” (Isaiah 45:5). To claim that a man who eats, sleeps, and handles money is “God in Creation” is the height of arrogance. It is the same lie the Serpent told in the Garden: “You shall be as gods.”

The False Elite: The “313” Who Bypass Judgment

The Text: “We had read some words which were attributed to you that stated that even the 313 enter paradise without judgment… He said, ‘They enter paradise without judgment, but they don’t get to the Day of Judgment without being judged.'” Page 246

The Analysis: Hashem creates a special class of “Elite” followers (the 313) who are promised an exemption from the final judgment. This is a common cult tactic to create an “inner circle” that feels superior to the “general people.”
The Refutation: The Word of the Most High is clear: Everyone will stand before the judgment seat. “For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each one may receive what is due for what he has done in the body, whether good or evil” (2 Corinthians 5:10). By promising his followers a “pass” on judgment, Hashem is giving them a false sense of security while leading them toward the very judgment they think they are avoiding.

Performative Humility as a Mask for Arrogance

The Text: “Imam Ahmed Al-Hassan… still speaks with humility. Even though he would not be judged, he still fears judgment. Even though he is God in Creation, he fears God Almighty.” Page 246

The Analysis: This is a psychological trick. By having the “Imam” act “ashamed” or “afraid” while the narrator calls him “God,” the book makes the blasphemy more palatable. It frames the claim of divinity as something “forced” upon the leader by his followers’ recognition, rather than something he is claiming for himself.
The Refutation: True humility is recognizing that you are a servant of God, not claiming to be God. If a man truly feared the Most High, he would immediately rebuke anyone who said “You are Him and He is you.” The fact that the “Imam” accepts this title proves that his “humility” is a performance designed to consolidate his power.

The Reincarnation of Al-Hussein

The Text: “Imam Ahmed Al-Hassan… is the return and reincarnation of Imam Al-Hussein… the Masters of the Youth of Paradise.” Page 246

The Analysis: This is not the theology of the Most High; it is a blend of ancient paganism and occultic transmigration designed to blur the lines between God’s unique creation of man and the rest of the natural world. By hijacking the names of holy figures from history (like Hussein), Hashem tries to steal their legitimacy for his own 21st-century movement.
The Refutation: As we have established, the “Wheel of Rebirth” is a pagan concept. The real Imam Al-Hussein finished his race and is with his Lord. He is not “returning” as an Egyptian-American filmmaker to ask for donations.

At the UK Apologetics Library, we stand for the Unseen, Transcendent God who has no partners and no equals. Abdullah Hashem is not a “God in Creation”; he is a creation of God who has lost his way. Do not worship the creature instead of the Creator.

The Illusionist’s Eden: Refuting the “Physical Paradise” and the Parasitic Eye Doctrine

we analyze the closing of the chapter on “Heaven and Hell” (Pages 247 and 248). Here, Abdullah Hashem moves from the carnal to the occult, claiming that Paradise is not a transcendent reward but a physical space occupied by a “parasite” living on the human eye.

This section reveals the ultimate psychological goal of Hashem’s “Seventh Covenant”: to convince followers that their reality is an illusion and that only he as their “Master” can grant them “freedom” from it.

The Materialist Deception: “Paradise is on the Earth”

The Text: “The Imam said… ‘A paradise whose width is that of the sky and of the earth.’ Paradise is on the Earth, my son.”

The Analysis: Hashem twists Surah Al-Imran (3:133) to claim that Paradise is a literal, physical space currently existing on our planet. This is a rejection of the spiritual nature of the hereafter. By grounding Paradise on Earth, Hashem anchors his followers’ hope to a physical, political territory his “Divine Just State” over which he has total control.
The Refutation: The Most High God describes Paradise as a reward that is “prepared” and “hidden” from the current physical perception. Jesus said, “My kingdom is not of this world” (John 18:36). By claiming Paradise is here and now, Hashem attempts to replace the eternal Kingdom of God with his own earthly organization.

The “Creature Over the Eye”: Cultic Occultism

The Text: “I said, ‘What is this covering…?’ The Imam replied, ‘It is a creature that lives over the eye. If a person draws closer to God, he is able to kill it and remove it.’”

The Analysis: This is perhaps the most bizarre and scientifically illiterate claim in the book. Hashem posits that a literal “creature” or parasite prevents humans from seeing Paradise. This is a classic cult tactic used to devalue the follower’s senses. If you can’t see the “truth” Hashem sees, it’s because you have a “creature” on your eye that only his “Imam” can help you “kill.”
The Refutation: This is not the theology of the Most High; it is a blend of ancient paganism and occultic transmigration designed to blur the lines between reality and hallucination. Scripture teaches that spiritual blindness is a matter of the heart, not a physical parasite on the eyeball. Hashem uses this “parasite” myth to make followers doubt their own eyes and rely entirely on his “revelations.” we also see this example used in the following groups I have listed below.

1. Scientology (Body Thetans)
Perhaps the most famous example, L. Ron Hubbard taught that human problems and “spiritual blindness” are caused by “Thetans” disembodied alien spirits that attach themselves to the human body like parasites.

The Tactic: Just as Hashem claims you must “kill the creature” on your eye to see Paradise, Scientologists must undergo expensive “auditing” to remove these invisible parasites. Both groups use an invisible biological enemy to explain why the follower cannot perceive the leader’s “truth” without the group’s help.
2. Heaven’s Gate (The Human “Vehicle” Contamination)
Marshall Applewhite taught that the human body was merely a “vehicle” that had been “brainwashed” by “Luciferians” (evil space aliens). He claimed that followers had to overcome their biological human nature effectively “killing” their human senses—to see the “Next Level.”

The Tactic: Both Applewhite and Hashem argue that your natural eyes are lying to you and that your physical biology is a “covering” or a trap that prevents you from seeing the true reality of the “Kingdom” or “Paradise.”
3. The Unification Church (The “Lineage of Satan”)
Sun Myung Moon taught that because of the fall of Adam and Eve, all humans were born with “Satan’s blood.” He claimed this physical/spiritual “pollution” prevented people from seeing God’s true kingdom on Earth.

The Tactic: This mirrors Hashem’s idea that Adam’s sin resulted in a physical “creature” or “covering” over the eye. By claiming the defect is physical/biological, the leader makes the follower feel “broken” and dependent on the leader’s “Divine Marriage” or “Seventh Covenant” to be purified.
4. Aum Shinrikyo (Astral “Vibrations” and Pollutants)
Shoko Asahara claimed that the world was filled with “pollutants” that clouded the “Third Eye” of his followers. He taught that only through his specific initiations (which sometimes involved drinking his blood or bathwater) could these “astral clogs” be removed.

The Tactic: Like Hashem’s “eye creature,” Asahara used the concept of a physical/spiritual blockage to explain away any skepticism. If a follower doubted the leader, it wasn’t because the leader was lying; it was because the follower was still “clogged” or “covered.”
5. The Order of the Solar Temple (The “Illusion” of the Senses)
This group taught that the physical world was a “trap” and an “illusion” maintained by spiritual forces that clouded human perception. They believed that only a “transit” (which eventually led to mass ritual suicide) would remove the “veil” and allow them to see the true Sirius-centered reality.

The Tactic: Hashem’s dialogue on Page 247 “You shall see paradise… when you remove the thin covering that is over the eye” is almost identical to the Solar Temple’s rhetoric. It frames reality as a “dream” or “illusion” and the leader as the only one capable of “waking” the follower.

The Demand for Absolute Blind Obedience

The Text: “The Imam… said, ‘I am sure of one thing, and that is that if I sent you to hell and told you it was paradise, you would go forth completely believing that it is paradise.’ I said, ‘Yes, that is the truth.’” Page 248

The Analysis: This is the smoking gun of a high-control group. The “Imam” celebrates the fact that Abdullah Hashem would follow him into Hell itself if commanded. This is the definition of spiritual suicide.
The Refutation: God gave us a spirit of “power, love, and a sound mind” (2 Timothy 1:7). We are commanded to “test the spirits” (1 John 4:1), not to follow a man so blindly that we would walk into Hell for him. By praising this total suspension of judgment, Hashem is training his followers to be slaves, not servants of the Most High.

“Paradise is Servitude to You”: The Theft of Worship

The Text: “I said to the Imam… ‘Paradise is servitude to you, Master.’”

The Analysis: The dialogue culminates in the narrator declaring that “Paradise” is not about God, but about serving the “Master” (Abdullah Hashem/Ahmed Al-Hassan).
The Refutation: This is the final stage of Hashem’s deception. He has taken the “Paradise” Jesus promised and turned it into a ranked, sexualized, memory-wiped earthly colony where “servitude” to him is the highest reward. The First Commandment is: “Thou shalt have no other gods before me.” By making himself the object of “servitude” and “paradise,” Hashem has set himself up as a rival to the Almighty.

The “Waiting Room” of Deception: Exposing the Occult Purgatory of Abdullah Hashem

At UK Apologetics Library, we have analyzed many attempts to rewrite the afterlife, but Page 249 of The Goal of the Wise represents a particularly cunning attempt to dismantle the finality of God’s Judgment. Abdullah Hashem (Aba Al-Sadiq) attempts to “clarify” Hell by introducing a complex system of multiple deaths and a “waiting area” called Samarat.

By analyzing this text in its entirety, we can see how Hashem uses linguistic trickery and occultic philosophy to strip the Gospel of its urgency and the Most High of His role as the immediate Judge of souls.

The Rhetorical Attack on Scriptural Integrity

The Text: “In the Abrahamic faiths, it is a place of eternal torment… darkness, emptiness, eternal damnation, and hopelessness… However, these depictions are far from sufficient and contain distortions.” Page 249

The Refutation: This is a classic tactic of the “Spirit of Truth” delusion we have exposed before. He doesn’t clarify scripture; he replaces it. To suggest that the Prophets were “insufficient” in their descriptions of Hell is to claim that God failed to properly warn humanity for thousands of years until Abdullah Hashem arrived.
The Analysis: Hashem begins by acknowledging the traditional Biblical and Quranic views of Hell only to dismiss them as “distortions.” By labeling the descriptions of “gnashing of teeth” and “eternal torment” as “insufficient,” he positions his own “Seventh Covenant” as the only source of “clarified” truth.

The Invention of “Minor” and “Major” Deaths

The Text: “The death that takes place between incarnations is called wafat (minor death), and the final death or major death is called mawt, and is at the end of all of a person’s incarnations.” Page 249

The “Samarat” Trap: Exposing the False Safety Net of Reincarnation
On Page 249, Abdullah Hashem attempts to dismantle the finality of the afterlife by introducing a fabricated waiting area called the World of Samarat. By redefining the Arabic terms Wafat (passing) and Mawt (death) as “minor” and “major” exits, he creates a tiered system of reincarnation that offers a dangerous “second chance” sedative to the sinner.
The Psychological Trap of “Minor” Death
Hashem’s claim that humans undergo a “set number of incarnations” is a direct departure from the Truth. By labeling death as “minor” and repeatable, he strips the soul of its spiritual urgency. This mirrors ancient Gnostic and Occult myths of “astral planes” where souls are recycled. It is a high-control tactic designed to make the follower dependent on the “Imam” to escape a cycle that the Most High never established.
The Scriptural and Historical Verdict
This doctrine is a blend of pagan transmigration designed to blur the lines of God’s unique creation. History and Scripture provide a definitive rebuttal:
Scriptural Finality: Hebrews 9:27 is explicit: “It is appointed for man to die once, and after that comes judgment.” Similarly, Surah Al-Mu’minun (23:99-100) confirms that when death comes, God says “No” to a second chance, establishing a Barzakh (one-way barrier).
Theological Consensus: Historical scholarship, from Irenaeus of Lyons to Imam Al-Ghazali, has consistently rejected Tanasukh (transmigration). They argued that multiple incarnations destroy the unique identity of the individual and render judgment meaningless.
Cultic Manipulation: Hashem’s secretive approach claiming to withhold details of Hell to avoid “scaring” followers is a classic grooming tactic used by groups like Heaven’s Gate. It creates a false sense of dread that only the leader can “solve.”
Conclusion
There is no “World of Samarat” and there are no “minor deaths.” Abdullah Hashem’s doctrine is a dangerous sedative intended to make you complacent. By promising another life, he robs you of the urgency to repent in this one. The journey of the soul is a straight line, not a revolving door. Reject the Samarat deception and reclaim the urgency of your salvation.

The “World of Samarat”: A Fabricated Purgatory

The Text: “In between incarnations, a person goes to a waiting area called the world of Samarat which is a purgatory-like state…” Page 249

The Analysis: Here, Hashem introduces a completely fabricated “waiting area” called Samarat. This term exists nowhere in holy scripture. It serves as a narrative device to explain where souls go between their supposed “rotations” on Earth.
The Refutation: This mirrors the Gnostic and Theosophical myths of “astral planes” where souls rest before being recycled. By calling it a “purgatory-like state,” he tries to sound familiar to Christians and Catholics, but he is actually describing a pagan “revolving door.” True theology teaches the Barzakh (intermediate state) or the state of waiting for the Resurrection, but it is a one-way street, not a “waiting room” for a return to Earth.

Collective Judgment: The Erosion of Accountability

The Text: “After the final death a person is judged over all his incarnations collectively… A person is judged over all of the lives that he or she lived.” Page 249

The Analysis: Hashem claims that Judgment Day is delayed until a person finishes all their lives. He quotes the Qur’an (23:100) regarding the soul’s plea to “go back,” but he twists it to suggest that God actually lets them go back multiple times before the final tally.
The Refutation: This turns the Final Judgment into a math equation of multiple lives rather than a personal accounting of one’s response to God’s grace today. It encourages the “I’ll do better next time” mentality, which is the ultimate tool of the enemy to keep souls from seeking the True Messiah now.

Psychological Grooming through Fear

The Text: “Imam Ahmed Al-Hassan… said previously: ‘We do not want to scare anyone at the moment by speaking about this (in detail).'” Page 249

The Analysis: Hashem concludes by claiming his “Imam” is withholding the “scary” details of Hell out of mercy.
The Refutation: This is a hallmark of high-control ocults (like Scientology or The Process Church). By hinting at a “Hell” so terrible it can’t be described, the leader creates a vacuum of fear that only he can fill with “protection.” It is a form of spiritual blackmail: “I know the horrors of the afterlife, and only by following the Riser can you avoid them.”

The “Hell” of Abdullah Hashem is a masterpiece of deception. It removes the sting of death by calling it “minor,” removes the fear of immediate judgment by inventing “Samarat,” and removes the clarity of scripture by calling it “distorted.”

At the UK Apologetics Library, we stand on the “Complete Word”: You havoiolie one life, one death, and one Savior. Do not be lulled into a spiritual sleep by the myth of multiple incarnations. Abdullah Hashem is not “clarifying” the fire; he is building a maze to keep you from escaping it. Reject the Samarat fabrication. Reclaim the urgency of your soul’s salvation.

The Price of Salvation: Exposing the “Money-for-Mercy” Scheme in Abdullah Hashem’s Hell

we have seen many false prophets, but the dialogue on pages 249 and 250 of The Goal of the Wise is perhaps the most transparent display of cultic manipulation in the entire book. Here, Abdullah Hashem (Aba Al-Sadiq) attempts to tie the spiritual fate of the world to the delivery of cash, using “divine pain” as a hook to guilt followers into handing over their life savings.

1. The Financial Ransom: Salvation by “Money and Base”

The Text: “Is the only thing delaying the promise of God money? Or is it also the numbers? The Imam said, ‘My son… the main reason is money, and after money is available, we shall only need a base…'” page 250

The Analysis: Hashem explicitly states that the “Promise of God” and the salvation of people from Hell are being delayed solely by a lack of funds. This reduces God to a helpless bystander who cannot act without a wire transfer. It transforms the “Riser” into a fundraiser, using the fear of Hell to pressure the narrator into delivering “money that is abroad.”
The Refutation (The Gospels): In the True Gospel, Jesus Christ never demanded money to establish the Kingdom. In fact, He warned, “It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God” (Matthew 19:24). Jesus sent His disciples out with nothing, saying, “Freely you have received; freely give” (Matthew 10:8). Hashem’s claim that money is the “main reason” for the delay of God’s promise is a direct contradiction of Christ’s ministry.

2. The Footnote Fraud: Twisting the Meaning of “Goy”

The Analysis (Footnote 5): Hashem claims the word Gehenna (Hell) contains the root “Goy,” which he translates as “nation” or “non-believers,” suggesting Hell is a place for those “outside the community.”

The Truth: This is linguistically illiterate. The Hebrew Ge-Hinnom (Valley of Hinnom) has absolutely no etymological link to the word Goy. Ge means “Valley” and Hinnom is a proper name.
The Exposure: Hashem is trying to redefine Hell as a place for “those outside his community” (the non-Ahmadis). By fabricating a linguistic link to the word “Goy,” he attempts to make his sectarian exclusion look like ancient Hebrew theology. He uses the reference to Moloch (where children were sacrificed) to scare followers, yet he is the one demanding they “sacrifice” their hearts and money to him.

3. Performative Grief: The “Tearing Heart” Tactic

The Text: “The Imam said… ‘By God, by God, by God… my heart is being torn to pieces due to… the people living in the state of oppression… I am also in pain over those who die while thinking they are going to heaven whilst they do not know that hell is awaiting them.'” Page 250

The Analysis: This is “altruistic narcissism.” The leader presents himself as the most compassionate being on earth, suffering more than the victims themselves. This forces the follower to feel responsible for the leader’s pain. If the narrator doesn’t bring the “money from abroad,” he is effectively “tearing the Imam’s heart.”
The Refutation (The Gospels): When Jesus wept over Jerusalem, He didn’t ask for a donation or a “base” in a foreign country (Matthew 23:37-39). He offered His own life. Hashem, conversely, asks for your heart and your money to ease his pain.

4. The False Revelation: “Grandfather” and the “Deep Sleep”

The Text: “Your Grandfather (PBUH) came and said to me some words which hurt the heart… if a rock was to hear them it would shatter… we are all shortcomers and yes the main reason is money.” page 250

The Analysis: Hashem claims a supernatural visitation from the Prophet Mohammed (“Grandfather”) to validate his demand for cash. He claims he was in a “deep sleep” until the narrator reminded him of the “frightening speed” of time. This creates a false sense of urgency (The 2050 deadline we exposed earlier) to ensure the money arrives quickly.
The Refutation: Jesus warned, “Watch out that no one deceives you. For many will come in my name, claiming, ‘I am he,’ and will deceive many” (Mark 13:5-6). A “revelation” that identifies money as the primary obstacle to God’s power is not a revelation from God; it is the voice of Mammon.

The Mark of a Mercenary Prophet

Abdullah Hashem’s “Hell” section (Pages 249-250) is not about the afterlife—it is about the bank account. He uses:

Fake Hebrew Etymology to alienate non-followers.
Emotional Blackmail to manipulate the narrator’s loyalty.
Blasphemous Claims that God’s promise is stalled by a lack of currency.

At the UK Apologetics Library, we remind you of the words of the True Messiah: “You cannot serve both God and money” (Matthew 6:24).

Abdullah Hashem claims to be the “Riser,” yet he is weighed down by the desire for “money abroad.” If his “Imam” were truly “God in Creation,” he would not need your donations to save souls.

The Thought Police of the Seventh Covenant: Exposing the “Advanced Mind” Escape Route

The true measure of any theological system is how it responds to difficult, honest questions. In Pages 250 and 251 of The Goal of the Wise, a female believer asks the foundational question of theodicy: Why did a good God create evil, ignorance, and pain? Instead of providing a divine, illuminating answer, Abdullah Hashem’s “Imam” systematically shuts down her critical thinking, insults her intelligence, and uses fear to enforce blind compliance. Let let us break down this text analytically and dismantle this standard cultic defense mechanism.

1. The Logical Collapse: “Evil Created Itself”

The Text: “Evil is the one who created itself when it became arrogant against God and against the Caliph of God. Iblis, may God curse him.” (Page 251)

The Analysis: When pressed on why God allowed ignorance or evil to exist in the first place, the “Imam” offers a massive theological contradiction: he claims evil “created itself.”
The Refutation: This is a philosophical absurdity that completely undermines the absolute sovereignty of the Creator. If evil can “create itself” independently of God’s sovereign cosmos, then God is not the sole Creator of all things. Furthermore, it completely dodges the woman’s actual question: Why did God create a system where such a choice or entity could exist in the first place? By blaming Iblis entirely without explaining the origin of the darkness Iblis was drawn from, the “Imam” proves he has no real answers.

Gendered Dismissal and Intellectual Gaslighting

The Text: “She has not understood and will not understand… Tell her, fear God my daughter, and do not enter into a matter which is more advanced than your mind, for verily I am afraid for you from this.” (Page 251)

The Analysis: The moment the follower’s questions become too sharp to answer easily, the “Imam” pivots to personal insults and spiritual blackmail. He claims the question is simply “more advanced than her mind” and warns her to “fear God” just for asking.
The Refutation: This is a classic textbook tactic used by high-control groups to suppress intellectual dissent. By telling the believer that her mind is too weak or inferior to understand the “mysteries,” the leader accomplishes two things: he protects his own ignorance from being exposed, and he makes the follower feel guilty, broken, and fearful for even thinking critically.

The Trapping Mechanism: The Delayed “Secret Knowledge”

The Text: “There will come a day where you shall sit in front of me and I shall explain this matter to you in great detail, God-willing… Because the matter now shall not reach her in a complete picture.” (Page 251)

The Analysis: To keep the questioning believer hooked, the “Imam” promises a future, exclusive, face-to-face meeting where the “secret truth” will finally be revealed.
The Refutation: This is a standard grooming technique used by cults. By dangling the promise of a future “complete picture,” the leader ensures the follower stays submissive and waiting. It implies that truth cannot be found in the open scriptures, but only in the private living room of the leader.

Weaponizing the Fear of Atheism

The Text: “These questions drag a person to atheism, God forbid… Because she shall think that she has asked questions and has found no answers. And this is the first door of the doors of the devil.” (Page 251)

The Analysis: The “Imam” creates a false dichotomy: either you stop asking these questions and blindly trust him, or you will fall into devilry and atheism.
The Refutation (The Gospels): The True Messiah, Jesus Christ, never feared honest questions, nor did He accuse sincere seekers of being under the influence of the devil for wanting to understand. When John the Baptist sent disciples to ask Jesus, “Are you the one who is to come, or should we expect someone else?” (Luke 7:20), Jesus didn’t tell him that the question was “too advanced for his mind.” He provided immediate, demonstrable proof of His fruits. God commands us to search out matters: “Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you” (Matthew 7:7).

The False Equation: Honest Inquiry Equals Demonic Influence

The Text: “Because she shall think that she has asked questions and has found no answers. And this is the first door of the doors of the devil.” (Page 251)

The Analysis: The “Imam” argues that the danger lies not in the lack of answers, but in the believer’s awareness that no answer has been given. By framing this realization as a trap set by the devil, the leader creates a psychological barrier. The follower is trained to blame themselves or a demonic force for their dissatisfaction, rather than recognizing the theological bankruptcy of the leader.
The Refutation (The Gospels): In the True Gospel, honest questioning is never treated as a “door of the devil.” When the apostle Thomas expressed profound doubt regarding the resurrection, saying, “Unless I see the nail marks in his hands… I will not believe,” (John 20:25) Jesus did not rebuke him as demonic. Instead, Jesus met him in his doubt, showed him His wounds, and provided tangible proof. God does not demand a faith that requires the total suppression of intellect; He invites deep exploration of truth.

Deflecting the Failure of the Leader Onto the Follower

The Analysis: This dialogue reveals a profound fear of exposure. The “Imam” states that the problem occurs because “she shall think that she has asked questions and has found no answers.” (Page 251) This is an open admission that the system cannot answer the problem of evil. Rather than admitting this limitation, the text shifts the guilt to the woman. If she walks away unsatisfied, it is not because the “Imam” failed, but because she opened a “door to the devil.”

The Refutation: True divine wisdom is transparent and stands up to scrutiny. Throughout scripture, prophets and servants of God frequently questioned the Almighty regarding suffering and justice (e.g., Job and Habakkuk). God responded to them with majesty and cosmic truth, not with defensive threats or insults. Hashem’s theology relies on keeping followers fearful of their own thoughts so they never notice the inconsistencies in his doctrines.

The Abuse of Spiritual Authority

The Analysis: By validating the statement, “I have heard atheists pose the same questions,” (Page 251) the text attempts to poison the well. It implies that if a believer asks the same deep questions about evil and suffering that an atheist might ask, they are effectively acting like an atheist. This creates a powerful taboo within the community, ensuring that no one dares to ask difficult questions for fear of being labeled an apostate or a tool of Satan.

Truth Fears No Examination

The claim that asking questions opens the “doors of the devil” is the ultimate defense mechanism of a false prophet. It is a protective shield designed to keep followers blind, compliant, and completely dependent on the leader’s absolute authority.

The Most High God is not threatened by honest human inquiry. He created the human mind with the capacity to reason, to weigh evidence, and to seek truth. When a religious leader tells you that your desire for deep, complete answers is a sin, it is because their system cannot survive honest inspection.

Do not surrender your God-given intellect to fear and manipulation. True faith does not require you to close your eyes to the truth; it opens them. Reject the intellectual prison of the Seventh Covenant, and stand firm in the light of the True Messiah.

The Ladder of Incarnations: Refuting the Multi-Faith Demotion Scheme and the Denial of Christ’s Ministry to the Dead

In our ongoing analysis at the UK Apologetics Library, we examine Pages 251 and 252 of The Goal of the Wise. In this text, Abdullah Hashem attempts to tackle a profound question: What happens to decent, simple people who strive to live a good life but never recognize the specific divine proof of their era?

Rather than relying on the vast, unconditional mercy of the Almighty, Hashem’s “Imam” introduces a rigid, highly insulting ladder of reincarnation that ranks world religions like video game levels, while simultaneously dismissing historical Christian theology as “falsehood.” Let let us break down this text analytically and debunk its claims using scripture.

The Arbitrary Religious Ladder: Insulting the Abrahamic Faiths

The Text: “That individual would not go to hell. Neither will they go to heaven. They would get the opportunity to incarnate again as someone closer to the Proof of God. For example, if they were a Christian, they would incarnate as a Muslim. If they were Jewish, they would incarnate as a Christian. In other words, they would continue to incarnate until they arrive at the highest truth.” (Pages 251–252)

The Analysis: Hashem sets up an arbitrary spiritual ranking system. A good Jewish person is “promoted” to a Christian in their next life, and a good Christian is “promoted” to a Muslim, eventually working their way up to Hashem’s specific sect.
The Refutation: This is not the theology of the Most High; it is a blend of ancient paganism and occultic transmigration designed to blur the lines between God’s unique creation of man and the rest of the natural world. True theology does not view entire global faith communities as stepping stones or spiritual demotions. In the Gospels, God judges the human heart based on light, sincerity, and love, not on a cosmic ladder of reincarnation. Jesus praised the faith of a Roman centurion and a Canaanite woman, noting that many would come from east and west to sit in the Kingdom while those who claimed exclusive lineage would be cast out (Matthew 8:11–12).

Dismantling the Hope of the Dead: Dismissing the Harrowing of Hell

The Text: “I asked… ‘Were all the souls that were in hellfire saved and given a new chance as part of the new Covenant with Jesus…? Or only the good souls?’ The Imam… said, ‘The good souls do not enter hellfire, this is incorrect.’ I asked, ‘But did the event of freeing souls from hell happen at all? Or is it all false?’ The Imam… said, ‘It is all false, these are all distortions and fabrications and are worth nothing.’” (Page 252)

The Analysis: When the narrator asks about the historic Christian doctrine of the Harrowing of Hell supported by the very scriptures quoted in the text the “Imam” flatly dismisses the entire concept as a worthless fabrication.
The Refutation: By declaring the liberation of souls “false,” Hashem directly rejects the profound reality of Christ’s victory over death and Hades. In the Gospels, the cosmic impact of Christ’s death is clear: “The tombs broke open, and the bodies of many holy people who had died were raised to life” (Matthew 27:52). To claim that Christ did not descend to liberate or declare victory to those bound by death is to strip the Gospel of its baseline redemptive power, replacing a completed historical victory with a perpetual cycle of earthly reincarnation.

The “Ice Pit” of Hell: Borrowing from Dante, Not Divine Revelation

The Text: “Iblis is at the lowest level of hell, and at the pit of hell it is ice cold and not fire.” (Page 252)

The Analysis: The “Imam” asserts that the deepest level of Hell is made of ice rather than fire, positioning this as a profound “revelation.”
The Refutation: This description is not a divine secret; it is literally lifted from secular Western literature. In Dante Alighieri’s Inferno (which Hashem ironically references in his own footnotes on Page 249), the ninth circle of Hell is depicted as a frozen lake called Cocytus, where Satan is trapped in ice. Hashem takes a famous 14th-century Italian poetic allegory and attempts to pass it off as an unvarnished divine reality revealed to his Imam.

Self-Judgment and the Ultimate Form of Disbelief

The Text: “Is it the human being who judges his own self?… The Imam… said, ‘Great job, you are correct.’ … The Imam… said, ‘The most extreme level of disbelief is atheism.’” (Page 252)

The Analysis: The text moves to validate the concept that humans create their own heaven or hell through self-judgment, while concluding that atheism sits at the absolute peak of spiritual error.
The Refutation: While Scripture agrees that human conscience bears witness to our actions, the ultimate authority belongs entirely to the Creator. True theology does not leave final judgment to human subjectivity; it rests in the hands of a Holy Judge. Furthermore, while the text condemns atheism as the “most extreme disbelief,” Hashem’s own doctrines which turn the afterlife into a repetitive, memory-wiped reincarnation cycle where men can become “God in Creation” do more to drive rational people toward skepticism than traditional faith ever could.

A Religion of Recycled Myths

Pages 251 and 252 expose the fundamental inconsistencies of the “Seventh Covenant.” It takes honest, simple believers and forces them into a cosmic reincarnation treadmill based on their earthly labels. It denies the historical, scriptural victory of Christ over the grave, and it copies its descriptions of Hell from medieval Italian poetry.

At the UK Apologetics Library, we remind you that the Most High does not run a spiritual recycling plant where you change religions every time you die. You are given one life, an intellect to seek the truth, and a Creator whose mercy cannot be systemicly organized by a self-proclaimed messenger.

The Astrological Gimmick: Refuting the “Hell is the Sun” Doctrine and Textual Fabrication

In this analysis of Pages 252 and 253 of The Goal of the Wise, Abdullah Hashem introduces an outright physical literalism to spiritual judgment, alongside a highly dangerous textual claim. By declaring that Hell is literally the sun and citing a verse “not found in the current Holy Qur’an,” Hashem completely breaks from the theological frameworks of the Abrahamic faiths to pitch a highly sensationalized, pagan-adjacent cosmology.

Let us break down this text analytically, cross-examine his references, and dismantle this doctrine using established scripture.

The Fabricated Quranic Verse

The Text: “Then the Imam… recited a verse not found in the current Holy Qur’an that is publicly available, ‘ﻗﺪ أﻓﻠﺢ ﻣﻦ دﺣﺎھﺎ…’” (Page 253)

The Analysis: Hashem boldly claims his leader has access to, and authority to recite, lost or hidden Quranic text that cannot be verified by the global Muslim community. The phrase he introduces (“Qad aflaha man dahaha”) mirrors the rhythmic style of existing chapters but acts as a complete invention.
The Refutation: This is a classic hallmark of modern sectarian leaders who seek to bypass the finality of established scripture. In mainstream Islamic theology, the protection of the Quran text is a foundational promise: “Indeed, it is We who sent down the message and indeed, We will be its guardian” (Qur’an 15:9). By claiming there is a secret, alternate version of the text available only to him, Hashem demands that his followers reject the preserved text used by over a billion people in favor of his unverified, private speech.

The Materialist Fantasy: “Hellfire is the Sun”

The Text: “And he said, ‘hellfire is the sun.’ … Thus, we see that hell is described as a fire because it is a literal fire, the sun.” (Page 253)

The Analysis: Hashem strips the afterlife of its transcendent, spiritual dimension and anchors it directly to our physical solar system. He claims that souls are physically “dragged to the sun” to experience heat and pressure.
The Refutation: This hyper-physical interpretation completely collapses the theological boundaries of the afterlife. In the Gospels, Hell (Gehenna) and the final state of judgment are described as realities outside our temporary, corruptible universe. Jesus explicitly references the passing away of the current physical order: “Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will never pass away” (Matthew 24:35). If Hell were merely the sun, it would mean Hell is bound by physical entropy and astrophysics. Furthermore, this concept borrows heavily from ancient solar-pagan anxieties rather than the spiritual accounting of the human soul before a Transcendent Creator.

Misusing Ephesians and 1 Peter to Support Modern Myth

The Analysis (Footnotes 10 & 11): Hashem cites Ephesians 4:9 (“He also descended into the lower parts of the earth”) and 1 Peter 4:6 (“the gospel was preached even to those who are dead”) to validate his physical-spatial claims about Hell and Paradise being right in front of us.

The Truth: These biblical passages have absolutely nothing to do with the physical geography of the solar system, nor do they suggest that the dead are floating toward the sun. Ephesians 4 refers metaphorically to Christ’s humility in descending to the earthly realm (or the realm of the dead) before His cosmic ascension.
The Exposure: Hashem relies on his followers not opening a Bible to check the context. He takes beautiful, deep theological statements regarding Christ’s victory over spiritual death and forces them into a pseudo-scientific conspiracy theory about the sun being a cosmic prison house.

“It Was in Front of Us the Whole Time” – The Illusion of Simple Answers

The Text: “I said, ‘Glory be to God! God is Great! It was in front of us the whole time.’” (Page 253)

The Analysis: The narrator displays a sense of sudden epiphany, a psychological reaction common in high-control groups when a leader presents a simplistic, highly visual solution to a complex mystery.
The Refutation: True divine mystery invites spiritual refinement, moral accountability, and a deeper relationship with God. Hashem’s revelation, by contrast, relies on a cheap cosmological gimmick. Turning a complex spiritual reality into a literal celestial ball of gas doesn’t elevate the soul; it merely satisfies a craving for novel, esoteric trivia.

Pages 252 and 253 show the dangerous lengths to which Abdullah Hashem will go to maintain an aura of absolute authority. To accept this teaching, a follower must believe:

That the global text of the Holy Qur’an is incomplete and that Hashem’s leader holds the missing pieces.
That the eternal judgment of Almighty God is limited to a physical star within our temporary solar system.
That biblical passages regarding Christ’s redemption can be stripped of their context to support a sci-fi cosmology.

The Creator of the Universe is completely distinct from His creation. He does not require the physical mechanics of the sun to execute His holy justice, nor does He hide His final warnings in unverified, secret books.

The Mechanics of Megalomania: Refuting the Fabricated Verse and the “Personalized Hell” Doctrine

In this analysis of Page 253 of The Goal of the Wise, the text shifts from cosmic speculation to direct psychological coercion. Abdullah Hashem introduces a terrifying new realm of punishment called “The Great Terror” (al-hawl\ al-azeem), claiming it was custom-made by God to punish anyone who “betrays” him personally. Alongside this, he attempts to validate his authority by asserting that his leader holds a secret, unreleased version of the Holy Qur’an.

Let us systematically analyze and dismantle these claims using historical scripture and textual criticism.

Refuting the Fabricated Verse and the “Hidden Qur’an” Myth

The Text: “This verse ‘qad aflaHa man daHaha’ translates as ‘Successful is he who has expanded it’. This is among the verses in the Holy Qur’an that will be revealed and is not in the current version… The complete Holy Qur’an is in the hands of the Qaim/Riser…” (Page 253)

The Analysis: Hashem claims that the phrase “Qad aflaha man dahaha” is a missing Quranic verse, and that the text used by billions of Muslims for over 1,400 years is incomplete. He asserts that the “true” complete scripture is hidden away, accessible only to his organization’s leadership.
The Refutation: This is a severe theological deviation. The historical preservation of the Qur’an is a verified linguistic and historical reality. The text explicitly declares its own unalterable preservation: Indeed, it is We who sent down the message and indeed, We will be its guardian.” (Qur’an 15:9) By claiming that foundational pieces of the scripture are missing or altered, Hashem attempts to undermine the authority of established scripture. This allows him to position his own modern writings as the ultimate source of truth. Historically, whenever a group claims to possess a “secret book” or a “hidden version” of standard scripture, it is done to bypass public scrutiny and demand total dependence on the leader’s private assertions.

The Personalized Hell: The Ultimate Cultic Narcissism

The Text: “The Imam said, ‘…We have prepared it especially for those who have betrayed you and hurt you.’ Tears fell down my face and I wept and said, ‘Glory be to God, for me especially it was created? For whoever betrays me?’ The Imam… said, ‘It is for whoever betrays Abdullah son of Ahmed.’” (Page 253)

The Analysis: This passage exposes the core psychological trap of the movement. The “Imam” tells Abdullah Hashem (Aba Al-Sadiq) that God has engineered a realm of torment worse than Hellfire, created specifically to avenge personal slights against him.
The Refutation: This directly contradicts the character of the Most High as a Just and Transcendent Judge. In the true Gospel and the Torah, divine judgment is based on cosmic righteousness, moral law, and a person’s relationship with their Creator not a personalized security detail or vengeance mechanism for a 21st-century internet personality. The Bible states: “It is mine to avenge; I will repay,” says the Lord. (Romans 12:19 / Deuteronomy 32:35) Turning the cosmos into a system that creates custom torture chambers for anyone who disagrees with or leaves a specific human leader is a classic symptom of high-control religious manipulation. It is designed to install an absolute phobia of exiting the group.

The “TRs” Gimmick: Weaponizing the Incomprehensible

The Text: “They are tormented by something called TRs. I said, ‘TRs? What is that…?’ The Imam… said, ‘I told you it is incomprehensible for the minds, you shall not understand it…’” (Page 253)

The Analysis: To heighten the sense of dread, the “Imam” drops a cryptic acronym (“TRs”) and immediately refuses to explain it, claiming it is too advanced for the human mind to comprehend.
The Refutation: This is a manipulation technique known as calculated vagueness. By introducing a mysterious, mechanical, or alien-sounding threat and wrapping it in secrecy, the leader forces the follower’s imagination to do the work. The follower fills in the blanks with their own deepest fears. True divine revelation brings clarity, light, and instruction; it does not drop sci-fi jargon to induce panic and force blind obedience.

Overturning the Standard Hierarchy of the Afterlife

The Text: “The fire is more merciful and gentler… hell is a paradise in comparison to it.” (Page 253)

The Analysis: Hashem attempts to minimize the traditional scriptural warnings regarding Hellfire by inventing a completely unscriptural “worse” place.
The Refutation (The Gospels): In the True Gospel, Jesus Christ speaks of the final separation from God as the ultimate and final consequence of unrepentant sin, describing it as eternal outer darkness (Matthew 25:30). To claim that a human leader can invent or command a separate, worse tier of torment for his personal detractors is to usurp the unique authority of the Almighty.

A Shield Built on Fear

The dialogue on Page 253 lays bare the structural mechanics of The Goal of the Wise. To keep followers from leaving, questioning, or “betraying” the group, the leadership uses three distinct layers of manipulation:

Scriptural Sabotage: Claiming the public Qur’an is incomplete to invalidate standard theological critiques.
Extreme Threat Inflation: Inventing a realm of terror worse than Hellfire to maximize psychological anxiety.
Ego-Deification: Claiming the universe bends its laws of justice to punish anyone who hurts the leader’s feelings.

The true Creator does not alter the fabric of eternity to serve human ego or personal vengeance. True faith casts out fear and brings the peace of a sound mind.

Do not be captive to a theology built on imaginary verses and personalized threats of terror. Reject the psychological chains of the Seventh Covenant, and stand firm in the authentic, verifiable Word of God.