Ecumenists Clifford Hill & David Noakes Moggerhanger Park

thefamilycenter_back

image-matrixcliffordhillClick on image to enlarge.

Galatians 4:6 Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?

*Citations and corrections are made at the bottom of this article

This article is written with a heavy heart, not to harm or destroy anyone’s faith, but to sound an urgent call for discernment and awareness. It is a sobering truth that even within Christian circles, error can infiltrate, and misplaced trust can lead to devastating consequences. The purpose of this piece is to shed light on troubling issues surrounding Jacob Prasch, Clifford Hill, and David Noakes, urging readers to approach these individuals and their ministries with extreme caution.

It is my sincerest hope that those who take the time to read this will carefully weigh the facts and prayerfully consider whether Jacob Prasch’s recommendations regarding Clifford Hill and David Noakes can truly be trusted. Moreover, it is critical to re-evaluate the credibility of ministries such as CCM, ISSACHAR Ministries, and Moggerhanger House. This is not a trivial matter—it is a deeply spiritual issue that concerns the integrity of faith and the safety of God’s people.

A Biblical Warning: Trust in God, Not in Man

The Bible speaks with undeniable clarity about the dangers of placing undue trust in human leaders. In Jeremiah 17:5-9, God Himself delivers a sobering warning:

5 “Thus saith the Lord; Cursed be the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm, and whose heart departeth from the Lord.
6 For he shall be like the heath in the desert, and shall not see when good cometh; but shall inhabit the parched places in the wilderness, in a salt land and not inhabited.
7 Blessed is the man that trusteth in the Lord, and whose hope the Lord is.
8 For he shall be as a tree planted by the waters, and that spreadeth out her roots by the river, and shall not see when heat cometh, but her leaf shall be green; and shall not be careful in the year of drought, neither shall cease from yielding fruit.
9 The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?”

This passage serves as both a warning and an encouragement. On the one hand, it highlights the peril of relying on human beings, whose hearts are inherently deceitful and prone to wickedness. On the other hand, it reminds us of the blessings that come from trusting in God alone. Those who place their faith in the Lord are compared to a tree planted by the waters, thriving even in times of difficulty and drought.

It is critical to recognise that no matter how gifted, eloquent, or influential an individual may appear, they remain fallible. The Bible’s warnings against trusting in man are not optional advice—they are divine instructions for our protection. To ignore them is to risk spiritual ruin.

The Seriousness of Misplaced Trust

The ministries of Clifford Hill and David Noakes, as well as their affiliations with CCM, ISSACHAR Ministries, and Moggerhanger House, must be carefully scrutinised. Have their teachings aligned with scripture? Have their actions borne the fruit of righteousness and integrity? These are not minor questions—they are foundational to determining whether these ministries deserve support.

Furthermore, Jacob Prasch’s endorsement of these individuals should give us pause. While Jacob Prasch has gained a significant following and wields influence within certain Christian communities, his support for Clifford Hill and David Noakes raises serious concerns. Is he exercising discernment, or is he leading others down a questionable path? As believers, we must resist the temptation to follow influential voices blindly, no matter how persuasive or charismatic they may seem.

The Bible commands us to test everything and hold fast to what is good (1 Thessalonians 5:21). This requires vigilance, prayer, and a commitment to God’s truth above all else. It is not enough to assume that a ministry or individual is trustworthy simply because they operate under the banner of Christianity. We must examine their fruits, their teachings, and their alignment with the Word of God.

A Wake-Up Call for God’s People

This issue is not merely about personal preferences or theological differences—it is about the spiritual health and safety of God’s people. To support individuals or ministries without proper discernment is to risk exposing oneself and others to error, deception, and potentially devastating consequences.

When we fail to question or challenge what is presented to us, we abdicate our responsibility as stewards of the faith. It is not unloving to hold others accountable—it is necessary. As Paul wrote in Galatians 4:16, “Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?” The truth can be uncomfortable, but it is essential for growth, correction, and the preservation of our faith.

Jacob Prasch

In the Christian faith, accountability is not optional—it is a biblical mandate. Leaders are held to a higher standard (James 3:1), and their actions, words, and affiliations must align with God’s Word. When leaders fail in this regard, they risk leading others astray.

The Bible speaks extensively about the dangers of false teachers and compromised leaders. In 2 Timothy 4:3-4, Paul warns:

“For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.”

This passage underscores the importance of discerning truth from error, especially in the context of leadership. It also highlights the reality that people often gravitate toward leaders who tell them what they want to hear, rather than what they need to hear.

Jacob Prasch has built a reputation as a strong voice against compromise, particularly in areas like ecumenism. However, his actions and affiliations raise serious questions. While he speaks out against ecumenism in word, his lack of discernment regarding those in his circle—such as Clifford Hill and David Noakes—suggests a troubling inconsistency.

As Christians, we are called to test everything against scripture (1 Thessalonians 5:21). This includes the actions and teachings of leaders, no matter how influential they may be. To fail in this responsibility is to risk being led into error.

What About Love?

One of the most common objections to criticism is the appeal to love. “Shouldn’t we just love one another and avoid being critical?” some might ask. While this sentiment sounds noble, it often misunderstands the biblical definition of love.

True love is rooted in truth. In Ephesians 4:15, Paul writes:

“…speaking the truth in love, we are to grow up in every way into him who is the head, into Christ.”

Loving someone does not mean ignoring their errors or enabling their missteps. On the contrary, it means caring enough to address issues openly and honestly, even when it is uncomfortable. This kind of love seeks the ultimate good of the other person and the broader community of faith.

In the case of Jacob Prasch and Moriel Ministries, loving them means holding them accountable. It means challenging their inconsistencies and calling them to a higher standard of integrity and discernment. To remain silent in the face of error is not love—it is negligence.

The Problem of Compromise

One of the most significant concerns surrounding Jacob Prasch is his apparent failure to discern the actions and affiliations of those in his circle. Clifford Hill and David Noakes, for example, have been linked to ministries and activities that raise serious theological and ethical questions. Despite this, Jacob Prasch has continued to associate with and endorse them, creating a contradiction between his words and his deeds.

Ecumenism is one of the most pressing issues in the church today. It involves the blending of theological traditions and practices in ways that often dilute or distort biblical truth. While Jacob Prasch has been vocal in his opposition to ecumenism, his lack of discernment regarding those in his “camp” undermines his credibility.

This is not a minor issue—it is a serious matter with far-reaching implications. When leaders fail to address compromise within their own circles, they risk becoming enablers of error. This not only damages their own witness but also leads others astray.

A Call to Discernment

The Bible calls us to be discerning in all things. In 1 John 4:1, we are instructed:

“Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, for many false prophets have gone out into the world.”

Discernment requires prayer, study, and a willingness to confront uncomfortable truths. It means evaluating leaders and ministries not by their popularity or charisma but by their faithfulness to God’s Word.

For theology students, this is a reminder of the importance of sound doctrine and careful study. For laypersons, it is a call to take responsibility for your own spiritual growth and not to rely solely on leaders or organisations for guidance.

It is easy to be swayed by influential figures or compelling rhetoric, but as followers of Christ, our ultimate allegiance must always be to Him and His truth.

How Did This Issue Come to My Attention?

The connection between Moggerhanger Park, ISSACHAR Ministries, and certain individuals such as Clifford Hill and David Noakes came to my attention after receiving two e-mails regarding a supposed “prophecy” from David Noakes, which had been circulated by none other than Jacob Prasch and Moriel Ministries.

What immediately stood out was Jacob Prasch’s unwavering endorsement of Prophetic Word Ministries, Clifford Hill, and David Noakes. This endorsement is deeply troubling for several reasons. Clifford Hill, for example, has been publicly associated with former Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams—a figure who not only supports ecumenical unity with the Roman Catholic Church but has also been linked to druidic practices. Rowan Williams has openly embraced interfaith collaboration and is known for his favourable relationship with the Pope. These associations should raise significant alarm bells for any Christian concerned about doctrinal purity and the influence of ecumenism.

Adding to the concern is the inclusion of ecumenical groups on Moriel’s website. Organisations such as Christian Voice, Clifford Hill’s ministries, and Reachout Trust are listed as if they align with sound biblical teaching. However, a closer examination reveals troubling compromises. Reachout Trust, for example, actively supported the ecumenical movement Hope 2008. Despite this, Jacob Prasch described Reachout Trust as “an important apologetics ministry that evangelises cults,” even going so far as to call Doug Harris “possibly the leading UK apologist.” This contradiction—highlighting ecumenical connections while praising such ministries—undermines Jacob Prasch’s credibility as a discernment teacher and raises questions about his discernment of those he endorses.

The Danger of Uncritical Acceptance

One of the most concerning elements of this situation is the expectation that believers should uncritically accept so-called prophecies originating from these ministries. Moriel Ministries has been complicit in this, presenting “prophecies” like those of David Noakes as if they should be accepted without question. But scripture is clear that all prophetic claims must be tested against the Word of God. In 1 John 4:1, we are instructed:

“Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, for many false prophets have gone out into the world.”

When we test these prophecies, it becomes evident that many lack the substance, clarity, and alignment with scripture that would confirm their divine origin. David Noakes, for instance, operates as an advisor for ISSACHAR Ministries, which is deeply tied to Moggerhanger Park and has clear partnerships with interfaith and ecumenical initiatives like Hope Together. This alone is a red flag, as it places Noakes and his ministry within a framework that compromises biblical truth by promoting unity with organisations and movements that deny foundational doctrines of the Christian faith.

The Bible warns repeatedly against false prophets and those who misuse prophecy for personal or organisational gain. Yet, despite these warnings, there seems to be a growing trend of ministries using “prophecy” as a distraction from more pressing spiritual issues.

Misplaced Focus: Why the Vatican Is Being Overlooked

One of the most troubling aspects of this entire situation is the way in which these so-called prophecies divert attention from the real spiritual threats facing the church. Prophecy has already been revealed in the Scriptures, and we are called to focus on the Word of God as our ultimate guide. Current events clearly indicate that we are living in the last days, with signs pointing to the soon return of Jesus Christ. Yet, instead of remaining vigilant against the clear spiritual dangers of the Vatican and its ecumenical agenda, many watchmen, Messianic, and discernment ministries appear to be distracted by speculative and untested “words from the Lord.”

The Vatican has long been a central figure in efforts to unify various religious groups under a single ecumenical banner, often at the expense of biblical truth. Instead of exposing this dangerous agenda, ministries like ISSACHAR and their associates seem to be entangled in the very ecumenical practices they should be warning against. This double standard is not only hypocritical but also spiritually dangerous, as it risks leading others into compromise.

Judgement Begins with the House of God

The Bible is unequivocal in its teaching that judgement begins with the people of God. In 1 Peter 4:17, we read:

“For the time is come that judgement must begin at the house of God: and if it first begin at us, what shall the end be of them that obey not the gospel of God?”

This verse underscores a sobering truth: God holds His people accountable first. It is not the unbelieving world that is the initial focus of His judgement but those who claim to belong to Him yet walk in compromise. Similarly, in Job 21:30, we are reminded that the wicked are reserved for God’s wrath. If God is to bring judgement, it will first be upon those who know the truth and yet fail to live by it.

This understanding makes the actions of leaders like Clifford Hill and David Noakes all the more concerning. Their histories reveal patterns of compromise and questionable affiliations that should prompt every believer to exercise discernment.

The Grave Doubts Surrounding These Ministries

When we examine the history of Clifford Hill and David Noakes, it becomes clear that their involvement in ecumenical and interfaith initiatives is not incidental—it is deeply ingrained in their ministries. This raises serious questions about their credibility and their commitment to the truth of God’s Word.

Equally troubling is the apparent blind spot of Jacob Prasch and Moriel Ministries, who continue to endorse these individuals despite their clear compromises. This lack of discernment not only undermines their own ministry but also leads others into confusion and potential spiritual harm.

Prophecy is a sacred gift, but it has been misused and abused by many who claim to speak for God. As believers, we must remain vigilant and discerning, testing every claim against the infallible truth of scripture. Anything that fails to align with God’s Word must be rejected, no matter who endorses it or how popular it may be.

Conclusion: A Call to Discernment and Action

The issues surrounding Moggerhanger Park, ISSACHAR Ministries, and the endorsements of Jacob Prasch are not trivial—they are of profound spiritual significance. They expose a pattern of compromise and distraction that is leading many away from the central truths of the Gospel.

As followers of Christ, we are called to be watchful, discerning, and unwavering in our commitment to biblical truth. This means rejecting false prophecies, exposing compromise, and holding leaders accountable to the standards of God’s Word.

Let us take this as a call to action—not to division but to greater faithfulness. Let us fix our eyes on Jesus, the author and finisher of our faith, and stand firm in the truth, even when it is difficult. For the time is short, and the return of our Lord draws near.

The Transformation of Moggerhanger House Park Trust: A Call for Theological Reflection

The Historical Significance of Moggerhanger House

Moggerhanger House holds a remarkable place in Christian history. Its connections to prominent Puritan figures, such as John Bunyan (1628–1688), author of The Pilgrim’s Progress, John Newton (1725–1807), who penned the hymn Amazing Grace, and Lord Shaftesbury, a renowned social reformer, have made it a symbol of biblical faithfulness and moral clarity.

However, this estate has undergone significant changes. Once a beacon of Puritan theology, it now promotes ecumenical partnerships that diverge from its historical foundation. Central to this shift is the leadership of organisations such as the Centre for Contemporary Ministry (CCM) and its partnership with figures like Jacob Prasch, who has supported some of the ministries linked to Moggerhanger Park.

From Puritan Roots to Ecumenical Expansion

The shift began in 1993 with the establishment of CCM, founded by Clifford Hill and his wife Monica. According to ISSACHAR Ministries, CCM became the primary residential ministry at Moggerhanger Park, initiating programmes like:

  • Clapham Connections
  • Transform-UK
  • The Christian Workplace Forum (later Transform Work UK)
  • The Thornton Institute for Leadership and Business Ethics

While these initiatives aimed to support evangelism and leadership, they also marked a move towards ecumenism. The transformation gained momentum with endorsements from notable Christian leaders, including Jacob Prasch, whose influence has raised both support and scepticism within theological circles.

Jacob Prasch’s Endorsements and Influence

Jacob Prasch, leader of Moriel Ministries, has been vocal in supporting ministries connected to Moggerhanger Park, including Prophetic Word Ministries, Clifford Hill, and David Noakes. Prasch’s endorsement of these figures is concerning given their ties to ecumenical movements.

For instance, Prasch praised Reachout Trust as “an important apologetics ministry that evangelises cults.” Yet, Reachout Trust has been criticised for its involvement in Hope Together, an interfaith initiative. Similarly, Clifford Hill’s connections to the former Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams, a druid and proponent of interfaith dialogue, add to the complexity of the situation.

Prasch’s full endorsement of ministries linked to Hope Together and ISSACHAR Ministries raises serious theological questions. If Prasch consistently warns against ecumenism in his teachings, why does he align himself with groups and individuals whose actions appear to contradict his stated position?

Clifford Hill and the Broader Ecumenical Network

Clifford Hill’s history of leadership includes founding organisations such as:

  • Prophetic Word Ministries (PWM)
  • Prophecy Today Magazine
  • C & M Ministries Trust

While these initiatives were originally rooted in evangelical principles, their growing association with ecumenical efforts has blurred doctrinal lines. Hill’s involvement with ISSACHAR Ministries and the Christian Workplace Forum exemplifies this shift.

One notable development was Hill’s partnership with Rev Yemi Adedeji, a CCM trustee and leader within the Evangelical Alliance’s One People Commission. Adedeji’s dual role as an Anglican minister and a Pentecostal pastor in the Redeemed Christian Church of God (RCCG) reflects the ecumenical ethos promoted by Moggerhanger Park.

Ecumenical Efforts and Black and White Church Partnerships

Efforts to unify black-majority and white-majority churches in the UK have gained traction through initiatives like:

  • The Zebra Project (1975–1990s)
  • The Conference for Christian Partnership (1980s)
  • The African and Caribbean Evangelical Alliance (ACEA)

While these initiatives sought to bridge racial divides, their ecumenical foundations often risked compromising theological distinctiveness. Figures like Jonathan Oloyede and Yemi Adedeji have furthered this mission, blending diverse traditions under the banner of unity. Prasch’s connections to ministries promoting these efforts cast doubt on his discernment in aligning with such organisations. (Source: Rev Israel Oluwole Olofinjana, Church Unity Reflections, 2012)

Prophecy, Ecumenism, and Distractions

A particularly troubling aspect of this situation is the reliance on alleged prophecies to validate ministry directions. David Noakes, who has been associated with ISSACHAR Ministries and Moggerhanger Park, delivered a prophecy endorsed by Jacob Prasch and Moriel Ministries.

While prophecy is a biblical gift, Scripture instructs believers to test all spirits (1 John 4:1). Prasch’s endorsement of Noakes, alongside his support for figures like Clifford Hill, raises serious concerns about his theological consistency. These distractions from biblical prophecy lead to a broader issue: the shift of focus away from the clear warnings in Scripture about false unity, as exemplified by ecumenical movements.

Biblical Warnings Against Compromise

The Bible provides clear guidance on maintaining doctrinal purity:

  • “Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers” (2 Corinthians 6:14).
  • “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves” (Matthew 7:15).
  • “Contend for the faith that was once for all delivered to the saints” (Jude 1:3).

By endorsing ministries linked to ecumenical initiatives, Prasch risks undermining these principles, inadvertently leading others to compromise.

Call for Theological Reflection

The transformation of Moggerhanger House from a Puritan stronghold to an ecumenical hub is a cautionary tale. It underscores the need for Christians, especially leaders like Jacob Prasch, to exercise discernment and remain rooted in Scripture.

While unity is an admirable goal, it must be built on the unshakable foundation of biblical truth. As stewards of God’s Word, we are called to evaluate our partnerships carefully, ensuring that they do not lead to theological compromise.

References

  1. ISSACHAR Ministries, official website.
  2. Evangelical Alliance, One People Commission, official publications.
  3. Hope Together, official website.
  4. Rev Israel Oluwole Olofinjana, Church Unity Reflections, 2012.
  5. Holy Bible: ESV, Crossway, 2001.

The Festival of Life: Compromise and Theological Concerns

The Redeemed Christian Church of God (RCCG), a prominent Pentecostal denomination, hosts an event known as the Festival of Life in London. This event is one of the largest Christian gatherings in the UK, attracting thousands of attendees each year. While it is marketed as a celebration of faith, worship, and unity, there have been growing concerns about the compromises made in terms of the theological positions and individuals welcomed to such events.

A Controversial Guest: Prime Minister David Cameron

One of the most significant and troubling aspects of the Festival of Life was the invitation extended to then-Prime Minister David Cameron. The decision to welcome a political leader who has publicly advocated for positions contrary to traditional biblical teaching raises serious questions about the RCCG’s commitment to maintaining doctrinal purity.

David Cameron, during his time as Prime Minister, was an outspoken advocate for the legalisation of same-sex marriage in the UK, a stance that is at odds with biblical teachings on marriage and sexuality. In addition to his support for same-sex marriage, Cameron has been a vocal supporter of homosexual rights, aligning himself with the broader political and social agenda of LGBTQ+ advocacy. His position is in direct conflict with the biblical understanding of marriage as the union between one man and one woman, as taught in the Scriptures (Genesis 2:24, Matthew 19:4-6, Romans 1:26-27).

Bowing Before a Sikh God: A Serious Ecumenical Issue

The concerns surrounding David Cameron’s presence at the Festival of Life do not end with his political stances. In an incredibly disturbing and symbolic moment, David Cameron was filmed bowing before a Sikh god during a public event. This act, seen by many as a sign of religious syncretism, was deeply problematic, especially for a Christian audience. In bowing before a false god, Cameron not only compromised his own Christian identity but also promoted the idea that it is acceptable for Christians to mix their faith with other religious beliefs.

The act of bowing before a Sikh god suggests a form of interfaith cooperation that goes beyond simple respect for different religious views. It reflects a theological mindset that undermines the biblical command to worship God alone (Exodus 20:3-5, Isaiah 45:5). For a Christian leader or organisation to associate with someone who engages in such practices is a cause for alarm, as it opens the door to ecumenism, a theological movement that encourages unity with false religions.

Acceptance at the RCCG Festival of Life

Despite these serious issues, David Cameron was not only invited to attend the Festival of Life but was also welcomed and received warmly by those in attendance, including key leaders within the RCCG. This display of acceptance and admiration for a politician whose actions are deeply incompatible with biblical Christianity raises several concerns:

  1. Compromise in Biblical Teaching: By endorsing Cameron’s participation and treating him as a respected guest, the RCCG implicitly signals that political figures who hold views contrary to biblical doctrine are acceptable within the Christian community. This compromises the RCCG’s credibility as a faithful witness to biblical truth.
  2. Theological Syncretism: The RCCG’s decision to align itself with a figure who supports both homosexual rights and the blending of religious beliefs calls into question the church’s stance on theological purity. Biblical Christianity requires clear distinction between truth and error, especially in matters of faith and practice. 2 Corinthians 6:14-18 cautions believers not to be unequally yoked with unbelievers, particularly in matters that compromise their faith.
  3. Ecumenical Tolerance of False Teachings: The RCCG’s willingness to receive David Cameron, a politician involved in interfaith and LGBTQ+ advocacy, as well as his participation in events that encourage religious pluralism, suggests that the church has embraced ecumenical tolerance at the expense of doctrinal clarity. This ecumenical spirit, while superficially promoting unity, often dilutes the sharpness of the gospel and causes confusion about the exclusive claims of Christianity. The call to repentance and faith in Christ alone becomes muddled when the church becomes entangled with political figures or religious leaders who do not uphold biblical truths.

The Bigger Picture: A Shift Towards Worldly Compromise

The invitation of David Cameron to the Festival of Life is part of a larger trend of compromise within many evangelical circles. As political correctness and social acceptance become driving forces in contemporary culture, many churches, including the RCCG, have made concessions in order to align with the prevailing cultural currents. These compromises, often made in the name of inclusivity and unity, risk eroding the distinctiveness of the gospel and the uncompromising truth of Scripture.

In the New Testament, the Apostle Paul warned against allowing the influences of the world to shape the church. In Romans 12:2, he writes: “Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewal of your mind, that by testing you may discern what is the will of God, what is good and acceptable and perfect.” The Festival of Life should serve as a time to celebrate the truth of the gospel, not a platform for embracing political agendas or ecumenical alliances that dilute the faith.

The Call to Biblical Discernment

This situation highlights the need for Christians to exercise biblical discernment and theological vigilance. In an age where political figures and organisations are often willing to compromise on essential doctrines, it is essential for the church to stand firm on the truths of Scripture. As Christians, we are called to test everything against the Word of God (1 Thessalonians 5:21), not to follow the tide of cultural change that is increasingly hostile to biblical principles.

Christians must ask themselves: Can we truly claim to uphold the gospel of Jesus Christ if we compromise on issues of marriage, sexuality, and religious pluralism? The decisions made by the RCCG in extending an invitation to David Cameron to speak at the Festival of Life raise important questions about the direction the church is heading. True unity in the body of Christ can only be achieved when we remain committed to the truth of God’s Word and refuse to compromise with the ideologies of the world.

CCM – Manifest Presence: A Dangerous Embrace of Mysticism

At CCM (Centre for Contemporary Ministry), the emphasis is placed on the importance of being “presence-shaped” by God rather than merely “purpose-driven”. The church leadership at Moggerhanger Park boldly states that they believe both truths—being driven by God’s purpose and being shaped by His presence—are essential for spiritual maturity. While this statement seems grounded in good theology, there is a glaring contradiction in their practices that raises serious concerns for those who are vigilant about doctrinal purity and biblical fidelity.

Purpose-Driven, Yet Lack of Discernment

CCM claims to caution against the dangers of being purpose-driven without being presence-shaped, which in theory, sounds like a well-balanced approach to spiritual life. However, the reality of their teachings and events contradicts this very premise. While they speak out against being driven solely by purpose, they simultaneously fail to confront and critique mysticism and contemplative prayer—two dangerous movements that rely on experiential, subjective encounters with the spiritual realm, rather than relying solely on God’s Word.

This failure to address the mystical practices being promoted within their ranks, especially at Moggerhanger Park, indicates a deeper problem. Rather than being shaped by the biblical presence of God, it appears that CCM is being shaped by mystical experiences, which take priority over sound biblical doctrine. This imbalance between spiritual experience and biblical truth can lead to dangerous theological positions that veer into gnosticism, where secret or hidden knowledge is emphasised above Scripture.

Embracing Gnosticism: Mysticism and Seer Prophets

One of the most disturbing aspects of CCM’s events is their partnership with mystics and gnostic influencers, such as the “prophets” and “seers” they associate with. This includes promoting individuals who claim to have direct spiritual insight that goes beyond the Scriptures—an idea that has been present throughout church history and has caused confusion and division within the body of Christ.

At Moggerhanger Park, one such woman is promoted as a speaker who is heavily involved in the mystical movement. She runs events at the park and states that there are “two expressions of ‘presence-shaped’ gatherings” that meet regularly at the site. These gatherings are advertised as places where individuals can experience the ‘manifest presence’ of God in a way that is deeply emotional and subjective, rather than grounded in objective, scriptural truth.

The gatherings are known as the Glory Gatherings, which occur on the last Friday of every month, and are followed by two annual conferences—one in April and the other in October. These events are intended to provide a space for people to encounter God in a highly emotional, mystical way. However, it is troubling that these experiences are not grounded in biblical teaching but instead revolve around mysticism and emotionalism.

Promoting Mystical Experiences: Michele Grandfield

At the heart of these mystical gatherings is Michele Grandfield, a key speaker at the conferences. Grandfield is known for her promotion of “soaking” (a practice that encourages people to lie down in a relaxed state and invite the Holy Spirit to fill them with peace and rest), visualisation (imagining specific images or sensations during prayer or worship), and an overall focus on emotional, experiential encounters with God. These methods are dangerous because they are rooted in practices that go beyond Scripture and create an environment where subjective experiences are treated as authoritative rather than the objective truth of God’s Word.

In a 2014 conference titled “Carriers of the Fire” in Llanelli, Michele Grandfield’s teaching reflects a disturbing trend in the charismatic movement. In the audio from this event, Grandfield can be heard teaching on subjects that are no different from the practices espoused by known false teachers, such as John Crowder, Patricia King, Joshua Mills, and Bill Johnson. These individuals are infamous for their promotion of extreme manifestations, such as gold dust, feathers, and mystical experiences that claim to bring people into direct contact with the supernatural, bypassing the Scriptures.

These kinds of experiences, which are becoming more prevalent in the charismatic church, have led many believers to question whether they are truly encountering the manifest presence of God, or if they are being led into deception. Such practices blur the lines between the spiritual and the mystical, undermining the centrality of biblical truth in the Christian walk.

The Biblical Role of Women in Ministry

A significant concern arises from the fact that Michele Grandfield and other female leaders like her are given platforms to teach spiritual matters, despite the clear biblical instructions regarding the role of women in the church. The Scriptures speak strongly on this issue, especially in the New Testament, where women are specifically instructed not to teach or exercise authority over men in matters of the church (1 Timothy 2:11-15). 1 Corinthians 14:34-35 further clarifies that women should learn in quietness and submission. Yet, in the case of the events at Moggerhanger Park, Grandfield’s teaching on mystical experiences goes unchallenged, creating a scenario where unbiblical practices are promoted and false teachings are allowed to spread under the guise of spiritual authority.

The New Testament makes it clear that the pastoral and teaching authority within the church is to be held by men, not women. While women are certainly called to minister, serve, and teach other women, the role of teaching men or leading the church in doctrine is reserved for male elders. By permitting women like Michele Grandfield to teach mysticism and lead worship events that focus on emotional experience, CCM is departing from biblical patterns and promoting practices that can lead to spiritual confusion.

The Danger of Mysticism and Gnostic Teachings

The central issue here is the rise of mysticism and gnosticism within the church. Mysticism focuses on personal, direct experiences of God that transcend Scripture, while gnosticism holds that there is hidden knowledge that only certain individuals can access. Both of these heretical systems lead people away from the clear teachings of the Bible and into subjective, emotional experiences that can be easily manipulated by leaders for control or personal gain.

In light of this, it is imperative that believers exercise discernment when it comes to events and teachings like those found at Moggerhanger Park. Rather than pursuing mystical experiences and subjective encounters, Christians are called to centre their lives on the Word of God, allowing biblical truth to shape their understanding of God’s presence, power, and purpose. 1 John 4:1 warns us to test the spirits to see whether they are from God, and we must approach teachings like those promoted by Michele Grandfield with caution, knowing that the ultimate authority for the believer is the Word of God.

The video above includes receiving and inviting angels, nowhere in Scripture are we instructed to have interaction with angels or spirit guides, if you examine this with other mystics you will find they teach the same things.

The Glory Cloud and Glitter Hoax Exposed: A Call for Discernment

The so-called Glory Gatherings, promoted by individuals like Michele Grandfield, have captivated many with their promises of mystical experiences, but they are nothing more than superficial fads that mask a deeper spiritual deception. These gatherings are presented as places where attendees can encounter the manifest presence of God through emotional and physical phenomena, such as the infamous “glory cloud” and glitter manifestations. However, beneath the surface, these events are rooted in occult practices and mysticism, dangerously leading people away from biblical truth.

Michele Grandfield: Promoter of Mysticism and Occultism

Michele Grandfield’s teachings have been heavily influenced by the Pensacola Revival, a movement associated with emotional excesses and unbiblical manifestations that originated at the Brownsville Assembly of God in the mid-1990s. Grandfield, along with other leaders in the movement, promotes a version of spiritual reformation and kingdom-building that centres not on the Word of God but on experiential encounters that lack clear biblical foundation. Her transformation message is an echo of the unbiblical practices that characterised the Pensacola movement, which prioritised emotional experience over doctrinal purity.

As one of the key figures behind the Glory Gatherings, Grandfield has associated herself with other prominent figures within the charismatic and mystical movements. These gatherings, under her leadership, have become a breeding ground for the promotion of occult and New Age practices disguised as Christian spirituality. She is known to support various unbiblical practices such as soaking prayer, visualisation, and other mystical experiences.

In one particular instance, Grandfield openly promotes Kathie Walters, a known mystic associated with the Elijah List (a platform known for publishing material from prophets and mystics). At 1:41 in the video below, Grandfield praises Walters, a leader in the New Apostolic Reformation (NAR), who has been tied to teachings that dangerously merge the occult with Christian doctrine. Walters herself has been affiliated with mystical practices, claiming experiences of direct communication with angels and even promoting impartation of spiritual gifts through direct, physical contact.

At 1:52 in the same video, Grandfield advocates for the idea that women pastors can be guided by angels and impartation. This is deeply problematic, as it violates the clear biblical teaching that pastoral authority in the church is to be held by qualified men as 1 Timothy 2:12-13 instructs. Furthermore, the emphasis on angelic guidance and impartation of spiritual gifts undermines the sufficiency of God’s Word and opens the door for false teachings and deceptive practices.

A Broader Network of Deceptive Teachers

Michele Grandfield’s involvement in the Glory Gatherings is not an isolated issue. She is part of a larger network of teachers and leaders associated with the New Apostolic Reformation (NAR), a movement that has been widely criticised for its unbiblical doctrines and mystical practices. The Elijah List, where Grandfield frequently draws influence, has been a platform for mystics and prophets who promote experiences over truth. Some of the most influential names associated with the Elijah List include:

  • Che Ahn, known for his promotion of “third wave” Pentecostalism and mystical practices
  • John and Carol Arnott, leaders of the Toronto Blessing (a movement known for promoting bizarre, unbiblical manifestations like uncontrollable laughter and shaking)
  • Heidi Baker, a prominent figure in the International House of Prayer (IHOP), whose ministry has been linked to extreme experiences and questionable teachings
  • Mike Bickle, founder of IHOP and proponent of contemplative prayer and unbiblical prophetic practices
  • Bill Johnson, who teaches about signs and wonders over the primacy of Scripture
  • Patricia King, known for her promotion of prophetic decrees and unbiblical spiritual manifestations
  • Joshua Mills, who has been associated with the “glittering gold dust” phenomenon, which is commonly dismissed as manufactured fraud
  • Rick Joyner, a prominent teacher in the NAR who has been widely criticised for his views on apostolic authority and mystical encounters.

Other controversial names include Cindy Jacobs, Kim Clement, Rodney Howard-Browne, and Paul and Janet Mills, who have all contributed to the spread of unbiblical mysticism and false prophecies within the charismatic church. These leaders, including Grandfield, promote experiential spirituality and mystical practices that cannot be found in the pages of Scripture. This dangerous teaching creates an environment where individuals are encouraged to seek out spiritual encounters that cannot be validated by God’s Word, opening the door to deception and spiritual harm.

The Glitter Hoax and the Glory Cloud Deception

One of the most troubling aspects of the Glory Gatherings and similar mystical events is the promotion of glitter and the glory cloud—phenomena that have been widely criticised as fraudulent or fabricated. These events often feature golden glitter or feathers falling from the ceiling, which is claimed to be a manifestation of the Holy Spirit. However, there is no scriptural basis for such manifestations, and many have suggested that these events are orchestrated through manipulation or even physical means.

The glitter and glory cloud are promoted as “signs and wonders”, but they do not align with biblical principles regarding signs (which were intended to authenticate the gospel message and point to the authority of Christ, not to create emotional experiences). Matthew 12:39 warns against the desire for signs, pointing out that an evil and adulterous generation seeks after them, a clear rebuke against the fascination with signs and wonders detached from the truth of God’s Word.

A Call for Discernment

The promotion of such mysticism and occult-like practices in the name of Christ is a serious issue for the church today. The Glory Gatherings and similar events are a direct challenge to the biblical gospel, which calls believers to worship God in spirit and in truth (John 4:24), not through emotional manipulation or mystical experiences. The Bible cautions believers to test the spirits and to discern the truth from error (1 John 4:1).

The teachings and practices promoted by Michele Grandfield, Kathie Walters, and the Elijah List are part of a larger network of deception that draws people away from the sufficiency of Scripture and the true gospel of Jesus Christ. Christians are called to hold fast to the truth, relying on the Word of God rather than experiences or personal encounters that cannot be validated by Scripture.

Moggerhanger House, The Filling Station, and Jacobs’ Involvement: A Stirring Blend of Evangelism, Ecumenism, and Community

Moggerhanger House, with its historic significance and Christian ethos, has long been a centre for various spiritual initiatives aimed at fostering renewal within the church. While Jacobs has not been involved in supporting The Filling Station, his work within the broader Christian community at Moggerhanger House Park places him in close association with Clifford Hill, a prominent figure based there. Hill’s ecumenical stance, however, brings a unique angle to the conversations around unity and evangelism, as he seeks to bridge divides between denominations, often encouraging a more inclusive approach to Christian ministry.

The Filling Station: A Call for Ecumenical Unity

The Filling Station, an ecumenical initiative, has gained traction in rural parts of the UK by encouraging churches of all denominations to work together on common projects. Its guiding Biblical inspiration comes from Psalm 114:8: “Who turned the rock into a pool, the hard rock into springs of water.” The verse symbolises the potential for spiritual revival, where the “rock” (Christ) transforms dry, spiritually barren places into fertile ground for new life. This idea of renewal is central to the mission of The Filling Station, which aims to offer spiritual refreshment to communities that may be struggling with decline or apathy.

However, The Filling Station’s approach is not without controversy, particularly among those who see its ecumenical push as potentially compromising the clarity and purity of the gospel message. The organisation seeks unity, but not necessarily doctrinal purity, and therein lies the challenge. While the intention behind these efforts is to create spaces of fellowship and revival, the question remains whether this is the same as the gospel-centred renewal described in the New Testament.

For those like Jacobs, whose involvement is more focused on the practical realities of community building, it’s clear that The Filling Station’s mission, while valuable in its unifying efforts, risks obscuring the more pressing need to proclaim the full gospel, as articulated in Romans 1:16: “For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to everyone that believeth.” Unity is important, but it cannot come at the expense of the truth of the gospel.

Clifford Hill: An Ecumenical Evangelist at Moggerhanger House

At the heart of Moggerhanger House’s spiritual mission is Clifford Hill, a theologian and Christian leader known for his strong ecumenical approach. Hill has long championed the idea of Christian unity, but not at the expense of the truth found in scripture. His work at Moggerhanger House Park is a perfect example of his belief that, while churches may differ in practices and traditions, they share a common mission in Christ. Hill’s ecumenical efforts have extended beyond mere fellowship and into a deeper, more intentional dialogue between denominations, seeking to break down barriers that have historically divided the body of Christ.

Hill’s belief in unity across denominations is not merely about cooperation but also about understanding the diverse expressions of the Christian faith. His view is that the church must come together in the spirit of collaboration to meet the growing challenges of modern society, yet he always emphasises that such unity must be rooted in biblical truth. This perspective resonates deeply with those like Jacobs, who believe that while ecumenism is necessary to move forward, it must not diminish the power of the gospel message.

Jacobs’ Role: A Bridge Between Ecumenism and Biblical Integrity

Though Jacobs has not been directly involved with The Filling Station, his work at Moggerhanger House Park intersects with Clifford Hill’s broader vision for ecumenism. Jacobs shares Hill’s conviction that churches should work together, but his focus is on ensuring that the gospel message remains central to these efforts. Jacobs sees the value in building community and fostering positive relationships among Christians of various backgrounds, but he also understands the importance of keeping the gospel message pure and unaltered.

Jacobs, in his role, assists with the practical implementation of Hill’s ecumenical vision, helping to create opportunities for dialogue and collaboration between Christians from different traditions. His involvement in Moggerhanger House Park often involves facilitating gatherings and creating spaces where different Christian groups can meet, share their experiences, and engage in discussions that promote unity in Christ. But Jacobs’ approach is always clear: while ecumenism has its place, the foundational message of Christ’s death and resurrection must remain at the core of everything the church does.

The Ecumenical Tension: Is Unity Enough?

The ongoing challenge of the ecumenical movement, as seen in both The Filling Station and the work of Clifford Hill, is the tension between unity and doctrinal purity. Unity within the body of Christ is essential, but there is a danger that, in seeking to unite diverse Christian groups, the gospel message may become diluted or lost in favour of social initiatives or community outreach efforts.

Hill’s approach to ecumenism is driven by the belief that, while denominations may have different theological emphases, the core message of salvation through Christ remains unchanged. He encourages Christians to find common ground in this central truth, while acknowledging the differences that exist between them. This is an important distinction—unity does not mean uniformity, and collaboration should not come at the cost of clarity in the gospel message. Jacobs, in his work with Hill, seeks to navigate these waters carefully, ensuring that ecumenical efforts always point back to the transformative power of Christ’s gospel.

A Clarification of Support for Hope 2008

In the ongoing conversation around ecumenical efforts, it’s also important to address the confusion that arose over the support for Hope 2008. Initially, there was an implication that Christian Voice had supported the event, but it has since been clarified that Reachout Trust was the primary organisation behind Hope 2008. Both Christian Voice and Reachout Trust were involved, but not all Christian leaders were in agreement about the event, with some, such as Alan Franklin, strongly opposing it. This controversy highlights the complexities within ecumenical movements, particularly when different groups have differing views on the role of the gospel in these initiatives.

Alan Franklin: A Voice of Opposition

Alan Franklin, a prominent Christian commentator and critic of the ecumenical movement, has consistently voiced his concerns about efforts like The Filling Station and other initiatives that promote unity across denominations. Franklin argues that while ecumenism might appear to offer a sense of cooperation and harmony, it often comes at the expense of doctrinal purity. He has been particularly outspoken about movements that, in his view, water down the gospel message in the name of unity.

Franklin asserts that ecumenical efforts can be dangerous because they blur the lines between essential biblical truths and secondary issues. In his writings and speeches, Franklin often highlights that the gospel is a call to repentance and faith in Christ alone, not simply a call for Christians to work together for social good. He believes that too much emphasis on unity can lead to the compromise of key doctrinal beliefs, such as the sufficiency of scripture and the exclusivity of Christ as the way to salvation.

Franklin’s opposition to The Filling Station and similar initiatives is based on his conviction that the gospel cannot be compromised for the sake of ecumenism. He maintains that unity should never come at the cost of doctrinal clarity, and that the church’s mission must always remain centred on the preaching of the gospel. Franklin’s critiques can be found in his published works and interviews, where he regularly warns against the dangers of ecumenical compromise and advocates for a return to a more biblically faithful approach to church unity.

Sauce References for Alan Franklin’s Views

  1. Alan Franklin, “The Dangers of Ecumenism”: In his book, The Dangers of Ecumenism, Franklin expounds on his concerns regarding the ecumenical movement, arguing that it often sacrifices biblical truth in favour of cooperation and mutual understanding. He critiques movements like The Filling Station for their failure to keep the gospel message at the forefront of their initiatives. Franklin’s argument is that unity must always be grounded in the truth of scripture, and that any movement which compromises this is ultimately undermining the gospel.
  2. Alan Franklin, Interview on Christian TV: In a televised interview, Franklin discussed the ecumenical movement and expressed his concerns about its impact on the clarity of the gospel. He noted that while the desire for Christian unity is commendable, it cannot come at the cost of doctrinal fidelity. According to Franklin, many ecumenical initiatives promote a generic, diluted version of Christianity that lacks the power of the true gospel.
  3. Alan Franklin, “Why Ecumenism Fails” (Christian Voice Publication): In an article published by Christian Voice, Franklin argues that ecumenical movements like The Filling Station often fail to address the core issues of salvation and repentance, instead focusing on social action and community outreach. He warns that such efforts, while well-intentioned, can lead to a watering down of the gospel message, which must always be the church’s primary focus.

The Ecumenical Tension: Is Unity Enough?

The ongoing tension between unity and doctrinal purity continues to be a focal point in the conversation about ecumenism. While unity is undoubtedly important, critics like Alan Franklin argue that it should never come at the cost of doctrinal integrity. Clifford Hill’s ecumenical approach, though motivated by a desire to bring Christians together for the sake of a greater mission, raises valid concerns about whether the gospel is always the centre of such initiatives.

Jacobs, working alongside Hill, understands this tension and strives to keep the gospel message at the forefront of his work. He believes that unity should never overshadow the need for clarity in the gospel, and that any ecumenical efforts must ultimately point back to the redemptive work of Christ.

Miguel Hayworth – 2025