Exposing the Sixth Covenant with Mohammed (His Family)
The Ahmadi Religion of Peace and Light posits a controversial theological claim regarding the nature of the Sixth Covenant, particularly in relation to Prophet Mohammed and his family. This article critically engages with this doctrine, addressing its theological implications, its deviation from traditional Christian teachings, and its inconsistencies with the biblical narrative. The central premise of the Ahmadi claim—that Prophet Mohammed attained the status of “God in creation”—presents significant theological challenges. This article explores why such a claim is not only inconsistent with the core tenets of biblical Christianity but also diverges sharply from Islamic monotheism.
1. The Ahmadi Claim of the Sixth Covenant: Mohammed as God in Creation
The Ahmadi Religion, under the leadership of figures such as Abdullah Hashem Aba Al-Sadiq, introduces the concept of the Sixth Covenant as a further extension of the divine plan, culminating in the figure of Prophet Mohammed and his family. The Ahmadi interpretation emphasizes the idea that Mohammed, through the famous night journey (Isra and Miraj), reached a divine status, ultimately claiming he is “God in creation.” This assertion is not only problematic from a theological standpoint but also contradicts both the Qur’anic and biblical teachings about the nature of God and the role of prophets.
The narrative presented by the Ahmadi religion suggests that God, as a loving Father, desires His creation to become like Him, thereby elevating Mohammed to the highest and final rank in creation. According to their view, Mohammed’s spiritual ascent during Isra and Miraj reflects a movement from human prophet to divine figure. The claim that Mohammed became “God in creation” is deeply problematic within the framework of Abrahamic faiths, especially as it contradicts the fundamental tenets of monotheism in both Christianity and Judaism.
2. The Uniqueness of God’s Nature: A Biblical Perspective
From a biblical standpoint, the claim that Prophet Mohammed became “God in creation” fundamentally challenges the core doctrine of monotheism, which is central to Christianity. The Bible consistently teaches that there is only one true God, and He is distinct from His creation. This distinction runs throughout both the Old and New Testaments.
In Isaiah 45:5-6, we read:
“I am the Lord, and there is no other, apart from me there is no God. I will strengthen you, though you have not acknowledged me, so that from the rising of the sun to the place of its setting people may know there is none besides me. I am the Lord, and there is no other.”
This passage affirms that God alone is the Creator and distinct from all created beings. To suggest that any human prophet, including Mohammed, could attain the status of “God in creation” directly contradicts this monotheistic understanding of God as presented in Scripture.
In the New Testament, the distinction between the Creator and His creation is reaffirmed in John 1:3, which states:
“Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.”
Jesus, the Word of God, is the agent of creation, but remains distinct from God the Father. This clear separation between Creator and creation underscores the biblical teaching that no human can ascend to the divine status of God. The claim that a human being could become God in creation thus contradicts the foundational monotheism of both Christianity and Judaism.
3. Islamic Doctrine: The Role of Prophets and God’s Uniqueness
Traditional Islamic theology upholds a firm distinction between God (Allah) and His creation. The concept of Tawhid, or the oneness of God, is central to Islam. Allah is wholly unique, and His divine attributes cannot be shared by any of His creatures.
The Qur’an consistently affirms that no one shares the divine nature of God. In Surah Al-Ikhlas (112:1-4), we read:
“Say, ‘He is Allah, [Who is] One, Allah, the Eternal Refuge. He neither begets nor is born, Nor is there to Him any equivalent.’”
This passage establishes that Allah is alone in His divinity, and no one can be compared to Him. The idea that a human prophet, such as Mohammed, could become God is not supported by traditional Islamic theology. Mohammed is regarded as the Seal of the Prophets, a servant and messenger of Allah, tasked with conveying the message of Islam to humanity—not attaining divine status.
In Surah Muhammad (47:19), it is made clear that Prophet Mohammed is a servant of Allah, and only through Allah’s guidance does he fulfill his role:
“So know that there is no deity except Allah, and ask forgiveness for your sin and for the believing men and believing women.”
This verse underscores the Islamic understanding of the clear distinction between the Creator and the Prophet.
4. Theological Implications of Mohammed’s Deification
The Ahmadi claim that Prophet Mohammed achieved the status of “God in creation” carries significant theological consequences. By elevating Mohammed—or any human—to such a divine status, the Ahmadi doctrine undermines the core principles of both Christianity and Islam. In both traditions, God is unique, eternal, and unchanging, and no created being can share in His divine nature.
In Christianity, the doctrine of the Incarnation teaches that God became human in the person of Jesus Christ, a unique event in history, where Jesus was both fully God and fully man. However, this is not about humans becoming divine; rather, it is about God taking on human form to redeem humanity. The idea that humans can ascend to divine status contradicts this biblical doctrine, which holds that God alone is the Creator.
In Islam, the sin of shirk—associating partners with Allah—is the most grievous offense. The notion that any human being could achieve divinity is a violation of the principle of Tawhid, making the deification of Mohammed not only incompatible with Islam but also heretical.
5. The False Doctrine of Divine Human Becoming
The idea that a human being—particularly a prophet—could ascend to the rank of God in creation distorts both Islamic and Christian beliefs. Throughout the Bible, prophets such as Moses, Elijah, and Jesus are portrayed as servants of God, fulfilling roles within God’s redemptive plan for humanity. These prophets do not assume divine status; rather, they point to God as the ultimate authority.
Similarly, in the Qur’an, Mohammed is described as a servant and messenger of Allah, not a divine figure. Surah 3:144 states:
“Muhammad is not but a messenger; [other] messengers have passed on before him. So if he dies or is killed, will you turn back on your heels?”
This passage reinforces the idea that no matter how revered a prophet is, they remain human and mortal, serving God’s purposes. The notion that Mohammed could transcend this role and become God in creation is incompatible with both Islamic theology and the broader monotheistic tradition.
6. A Deeper Look into the Doctrine of the Sixth Covenant
The Ahmadi interpretation of the Sixth Covenant not only elevates Mohammed to divine status but also asserts that this divine rank extends to his family, particularly his descendants. The idea that the lineage of a human prophet could hold divine significance creates a theological framework that is vastly different from both biblical Christianity and traditional Islam. Both faiths reject the notion that any human family line holds inherent divine status, let alone one that transforms an entire family into co-creators or divine beings.
In Christianity, the concept of Jesus as the eternal Son of God is not tied to a human family lineage in the way the Ahmadi doctrine suggests. While Jesus was born into the family of Mary and Joseph, His divine nature is based on His eternal existence as the Word of God, not on a human family line. The idea that a human family can hold divine status contradicts the biblical narrative of salvation and the eternal nature of God.
Similarly, traditional Islamic teachings do not support the notion that the descendants of Mohammed share in his prophetic or divine status. While his family, the Ahl al-Bayt, is highly revered, they are not considered divine. The Qur’an makes it clear that prophets are human beings who, while guided by Allah, do not transcend their humanity.
7. Conclusion: Reaffirming the True Understanding of Prophecy and Divinity
The Ahmadi claim regarding the Sixth Covenant and Mohammed’s deification is theologically unsound and dangerously distorts both Islamic and Christian teachings. By elevating Mohammed to the status of God in creation, the Ahmadi doctrine contradicts the essential monotheism that underpins both faiths.
In Christianity, God is revealed as three-in-one, with Jesus Christ as the incarnate Word, fulfilling the role of divine revelation to humanity. In Islam, Allah is uniquely One, and the prophets, including Mohammed, are His servants, tasked with guiding humanity to worship the one true God. The elevation of Mohammed to divine status is therefore a heretical deviation from both biblical and Qur’anic teachings.
As defenders of the true revelation of God, we must reject such false doctrines and reaffirm the biblical and Qur’anic understanding of the unique and distinct nature of God. Both the Bible and the Qur’an emphasize the importance of recognizing the Creator as the only true God, and any attempt to elevate a human being to the status of divinity distorts the very essence of monotheism.