Abstract
Why Chapter 2 of Abdullah Hashem Aba Al-Sadiq’s Book Is Biblically Wrong
Chapter 2 of Abdullah Hashem Aba Al-Sadiq’s book, titled “Door Number Two,” presents a series of theological claims that are fundamentally at odds with biblical doctrine. Below is an analysis of the key reasons why the arguments presented in this chapter are biblically incorrect.
1. The False Dichotomy Between Two Doors
In Chapter 2, Al-Sadiq presents a theological framework that contrasts two metaphorical doors: one representing the traditional understanding of divine judgment and hell (which he claims to be a human invention), and the other representing the “truth” of the Seventh Covenant, supposedly revealed through the Yamani figure. This creates a false dichotomy, presenting the first door as an oppressive and unjust system of punishment, and the second as the enlightened path to salvation.
Biblical Refutation:
- The Bible never presents salvation and judgment in this dualistic way. The Bible teaches that God’s justice and mercy are not mutually exclusive but are reconciled in the person of Jesus Christ. Scripture states that God is both “just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus” (Romans 3:26). The dichotomy proposed by Al-Sadiq is unbiblical and misleading.
- The claim that traditional doctrines of hell are a mere human invention overlooks the clear teachings of Scripture regarding divine justice. Jesus spoke more about hell than any other figure in the Bible, consistently affirming its reality (Matthew 5:22, 29–30; Mark 9:43–48). Rejecting these teachings in favor of a more palatable alternative distorts the biblical gospel.
2. The Denial of God’s Justice and the Doctrine of Hell
Al-Sadiq’s argument downplays or denies the biblical doctrine of hell, dismissing it as a human construct designed to manipulate people through fear. He attempts to portray God’s justice as a warped theological invention, claiming that the concept of eternal punishment is a distortion of God’s nature.
Biblical Refutation:
- The Bible clearly teaches the reality of eternal punishment for the unrepentant (Matthew 25:46; Revelation 20:15). Hell is not a man-made concept but a solemn reality presented in Scripture.
- The doctrine of hell is consistent with the biblical view of God’s holiness. In the Bible, God’s justice is inseparable from His holiness. His wrath against sin is necessary because of His perfect nature. To deny hell is to undermine the biblical understanding of God’s justice and to diminish the gravity of human sin.
- The denial of hell also undermines the gospel of grace. The sacrifice of Jesus Christ on the cross is necessary because of the reality of judgment. As Paul writes in Romans 5:9, “Since we have now been justified by his blood, how much more shall we be saved from God’s wrath through him?”
3. The Exaltation of the Yamani Figure: A Replacement for Christ
One of the most serious errors in Chapter 2 is the elevation of the Yamani figure as a divinely appointed leader who is said to offer a new pathway to salvation through the Seventh Covenant. This figure is presented as having special access to truth and spiritual authority, and Al-Sadiq claims that following him is essential for understanding the full revelation of God’s plan.
Biblical Refutation:
- The Bible teaches that Jesus Christ is the only mediator between God and man (1 Timothy 2:5). To elevate any figure to the level of Christ is to distort the fundamental Christian understanding of salvation. Jesus alone is the “way, the truth, and the life” (John 14:6), and no one else has the authority to alter or complete His work.
- The apostles repeatedly emphasized that the gospel message was complete in Christ and entrusted to them (Galatians 1:8–9). The claim that the Yamani figure provides a superior or hidden revelation is a direct contradiction to this apostolic teaching. The New Testament warns against anyone who would add to or subtract from the gospel (Revelation 22:18–19).
- The Apostle Paul condemns those who preach a “different gospel” (Galatians 1:6–9), which is what Al-Sadiq is doing by proposing a new and alternative system of salvation through the Yamani.
4. The Doctrine of the Seventh Covenant: A False New Covenant
Al-Sadiq introduces the concept of the “Seventh Covenant,” a new and exclusive covenant that supposedly fulfills biblical prophecies in ways that surpass the Old and New Covenants. This is a central aspect of the theology in Chapter 2, as Al-Sadiq claims that the new covenant is not based on Christ but on the teachings of the Yamani.
Biblical Refutation:
- The Bible makes it clear that the New Covenant is established by the blood of Jesus Christ, and it is the fulfillment of Old Testament prophecy (Luke 22:20; Hebrews 8:6–13). Jesus Himself proclaimed that the New Covenant was initiated through His sacrifice on the cross (Mark 14:24).
- The introduction of a “Seventh Covenant” is a direct denial of the sufficiency and finality of Christ’s work. Hebrews 10:10 declares, “We have been sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.” To suggest that a new covenant is necessary is to undermine the centrality of Christ’s atonement.
- Furthermore, the Bible teaches that there is no additional covenant after the New Covenant. Jesus’ final words on the cross, “It is finished” (John 19:30), indicate that His work was complete and no further revelation or covenant is required for salvation.
5. The Misinterpretation of Prophetic Texts
Throughout Chapter 2, Al-Sadiq reinterprets prophetic texts to support his views about the Seventh Covenant and the role of the Yamani figure. For example, he misuses passages from the Old Testament and the book of Revelation, applying them to his own eschatological framework without regard for their historical or theological context.
Biblical Refutation:
- The Bible consistently warns against private interpretations of prophecy (2 Peter 1:20). Al-Sadiq’s approach to Scripture is a classic example of eisegesis—reading his own ideas into the text rather than interpreting it according to its original context.
- Biblical prophecy, especially in books like Daniel and Revelation, points ultimately to the person and work of Jesus Christ. Jesus Himself interpreted the Old Testament prophecies as being about Him (Luke 24:27), and the apostles continued this interpretation in their writings. Al-Sadiq’s reinterpretation of these prophecies to support the idea of the Yamani is therefore unbiblical and lacks any legitimate scriptural foundation.
Conclusion: A Call to Biblical Faithfulness
Chapter 2 of Abdullah Hashem Aba Al-Sadiq’s book is a theological distortion that leads believers away from the true gospel of Jesus Christ. It creates a false dichotomy between two doors, denies the biblical doctrine of hell, elevates a human figure above Christ, and introduces an unbiblical “Seventh Covenant.” All of these errors are in direct contradiction to the teachings of Scripture.
The Bible affirms that salvation is found in Christ alone, through His death and resurrection (Acts 4:12; Ephesians 2:8–9). To follow any teaching that deviates from this central truth is to fall into spiritual deception. Theology students and church leaders must be vigilant in exposing such heresies and steadfast in proclaiming the full gospel of grace as revealed in the Bible.