The Ahmadi Religion of Peace and Light, as represented by its foundational text The Goal of the Wise: The Gospel of the Riser of the Family of Mohammed, presents a vision of divine succession and spiritual enlightenment purported to be the culmination of all prior religious covenants. This text, authored by Abdullah Hashem Aba Al-Sadiq, is presented as a continuation and clarification of God’s communications, building on the legacy of prophets from Adam to Mohammed. It claims to offer a new understanding of divine revelation, through the figure of Abdullah Hashem, and emphasizes the authority of living, accessible divine leaders as opposed to distant, historical scriptures.
However, upon closer inspection, this claim stands in stark contrast to biblical Christianity and traditional Christian doctrines of revelation, authority, and salvation. This article will explore the theological issues within the Gospel of the Riser and provide a Christian perspective that refutes the claims made by Abdullah Hashem and the Ahmadi Religion of Peace and Light, focusing specifically on the teachings regarding the “Seventh Covenant.”
1. The Claim of Divine Succession
The central claim of The Goal of the Wise is that the current divine guidance, embodied in Abdullah Hashem Aba Al-Sadiq and his associates, represents the ultimate fulfillment of divine prophecies. The text asserts that Hashem and his contemporaries hold a unique spiritual authority that stems from a divinely preserved will left by the Prophet Mohammed, which supposedly grants them authority over all of humanity in this modern era. This claim fundamentally contradicts the Christian view of finality in divine revelation, as articulated in the New Testament.
Christian theology teaches that Jesus Christ, the Son of God, is the final revelation of God’s will to humanity (Hebrews 1:1-2). Christ’s death, resurrection, and ascension are seen as the culmination of God’s redemptive plan, and no new divine messages or prophets are to be expected after Him. As the Apostle Paul warns in Galatians 1:8-9, anyone who preaches a gospel different from that of Christ is to be accursed. The claim of Abdullah Hashem and the Ahmadi Religion of Peace and Light thus falls outside of orthodox Christian doctrine, as it posits that new divine authority has emerged after Christ.
2. The Seventh Covenant: A Deviation from Biblical Covenants
The Goal of the Wise claims that the “Seventh Covenant” represents a universal agreement between God and humanity, transcending geography, language, and culture. This idea is deeply problematic for several reasons.
First, the Bible clearly outlines a sequence of covenants established by God with humanity, each of which builds upon the previous one, culminating in the New Covenant through Jesus Christ (Jeremiah 31:31-34, Luke 22:20). There is no biblical basis for a “Seventh Covenant” after the New Covenant, which Christians believe is eternal and unchanging. The concept of a new covenant following the death and resurrection of Christ undermines the sufficiency and finality of His atoning sacrifice. Hebrews 10:12-14 explicitly states that Christ’s sacrifice was the ultimate offering for sin, and no further sacrifice or covenant is necessary.
Furthermore, the emphasis placed on “living, accessible divine leaders” contradicts the Christian teaching that Jesus, through the Holy Spirit, remains present and active in the lives of believers. Christ promised His ongoing presence through the indwelling of the Holy Spirit (John 14:16-17), which renders any claim to physical, living, and accessible leaders unnecessary. The idea that humanity requires a new intermediary leader for spiritual guidance directly contradicts the sufficiency of Christ’s work.
3. The Role of Scriptures and the “Incompleteness” of Previous Revelations
A critical element in The Goal of the Wise is the assertion that all previous scriptures are inherently incomplete and that the written word is inadequate in conveying the full meaning of God’s will. Abdullah Hashem argues that previous scriptures, including the Bible and the Qur’an, were “incomplete” because they were written after the death of their respective prophets and were subject to distortion over time.
Christian theology, however, maintains that the Bible, as the inspired word of God, is complete and sufficient for teaching, rebuking, correcting, and training in righteousness (2 Timothy 3:16-17). The Bible affirms that God’s revelation to humanity through scripture is perfect and unchanging, preserved by God Himself for all generations (Psalm 119:89). The Christian view holds that God’s Word is “living and active” (Hebrews 4:12) and, through the work of the Holy Spirit, remains fully sufficient for all matters of faith and practice. To suggest that these scriptures are incomplete or flawed is to deny the perfection of God’s revelation.
4. The Exclusion of Jesus Christ in the “Seventh Covenant”
At the core of the Ahmadi Religion of Peace and Light’s theology is the exclusion of Jesus Christ from the center of God’s redemptive plan, a claim that is ultimately the most significant theological error. According to The Goal of the Wise, the “Seventh Covenant” is the final covenant with humanity, yet it does not recognize Christ as the central figure of that covenant. Instead, the text places Abdullah Hashem and his contemporaries in the role of spiritual leaders who supposedly continue the work of the prophets.
The Apostle Paul writes in Colossians 1:19-20 that “God was pleased to have all his fullness dwell in [Jesus], and through him to reconcile to himself all things…by making peace through his blood, shed on the cross.” The New Testament consistently asserts that Jesus Christ is the culmination of God’s revelation to humanity and the only mediator between God and man (1 Timothy 2:5). Any spiritual system that places someone other than Jesus at the center of God’s redemptive work is a deviation from biblical truth and cannot be regarded as Christian.
5. Conclusion: The Need for a True Understanding of God’s Final Word
The claims of Abdullah Hashem and the Ahmadi Religion of Peace and Light are deeply problematic from a Christian theological perspective. The assertion of a new divine authority, the introduction of a “Seventh Covenant,” and the denial of the finality of Jesus Christ’s atoning work all run contrary to the core teachings of the Bible. Christianity teaches that God’s revelation through Jesus Christ is both complete and sufficient for salvation, and no new revelations or covenants are necessary.
As Christians, we are called to adhere to the teachings of the Bible, the final and complete Word of God. The call to follow living leaders who claim divine authority after the time of Christ undermines the sufficiency of His sacrifice and the enduring presence of the Holy Spirit. The Gospel of Jesus Christ remains the true message of salvation, and it is through faith in Him alone that we can find reconciliation with God and eternal life.
In rejecting the “Seventh Covenant,” we affirm the centrality of Christ’s life, death, and resurrection as the ultimate fulfillment of God’s promises to humanity. May all who seek truth turn to the Word of God as revealed in Scripture, and may they find peace in the knowledge that the final covenant has already been established through Jesus Christ, the Riser and Redeemer of all.
Refutation of the Ahmadi Interpretation of the First Covenant with Adam
The Ahmadi Religion of Peace and Light, led by figures such as Abdullah Hashem Aba Al-Sadiq and Imam Ahmed Al-Hassan, presents numerous theological distortions that undermine the integrity of biblical truth. The leader of this cult demonstrates significant ignorance of the Bible’s teachings and distorts key doctrines to fit his ideological framework. Through a careful examination of the key theological claims made by Ahmed Al-Hassan and the Ahmadi Religion, we will expose the weaknesses in their theological understanding and demonstrate how their interpretations fall short of biblical truth.
1. The Distorted Interpretation of Adam’s Fall
One of the central claims of the Ahmadi Religion is that Adam’s fall was not due to his disobedience to God, but rather from envy toward Muhammad, Ali, and their family. This is a gross misinterpretation of the biblical account of the fall of man. According to Genesis 3, Adam and Eve ate the fruit from the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, directly defying God’s explicit command (Genesis 2:16-17). This act of disobedience, not envy, is the root cause of humanity’s fall into sin.
The Ahmadi leader’s interpretation is not only theologically weak but also ignorant of the Bible’s clear presentation of the human condition. The idea that Adam’s sin was motivated by envy toward human beings contradicts the Bible’s teaching that the fall was a result of a choice to sin against God’s will (Genesis 3:6). The New Testament further supports this view, stating that “sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin” (Romans 5:12), not because of personal envy of a family line. By reinterpreting the fall, the Ahmadi leader undermines the core doctrine of original sin, which is central to the Christian faith.
2. The Allegorical View of the Forbidden Tree
The Ahmadi leader claims that the forbidden tree in the Garden of Eden is symbolic of Muhammad and his family, a stark deviation from the biblical description of the tree as a literal, physical object. In the Bible, the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil is not an allegory but a literal tree that served as a test of Adam and Eve’s obedience. God’s command was simple: “You shall not eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil” (Genesis 2:17).
By introducing the idea that the tree symbolizes Muhammad and his family, the Ahmadi leader is distorting the narrative and imposing an interpretation that the text simply does not support. The Bible presents the fall as a direct disobedience to God’s command, not a political or theological disagreement about specific human beings. This misreading shows a lack of understanding of the biblical text and exposes the leader’s theological ignorance.
3. Redefining Original Sin and Its Consequences
The Ahmadi interpretation of Adam’s fall drastically weakens the doctrine of original sin. Christianity teaches that because of Adam’s sin, all humanity is born into sin and is in need of salvation through Jesus Christ. The Apostle Paul writes in Romans 5:18-19, “Consequently, just as one trespass resulted in condemnation for all people, so also one righteous act resulted in justification and life for all people.”
By focusing on an alleged envy that led to Adam’s fall, rather than the universal and eternal consequences of original sin, the Ahmadi leader undermines the need for redemption. In doing so, he demonstrates a profound misunderstanding of the Bible’s teaching on human nature and the need for salvation. If Adam’s sin was simply a result of envy, then the catastrophic consequences for humanity—namely, spiritual death and separation from God—become meaningless and unnecessary. This perspective strips away the depth and seriousness of the fall, showing a weak and ignorant understanding of the biblical doctrine of sin.
4. The Misunderstanding of Divine Law and Jurisprudence
The Ahmadi leader claims that divine laws were insufficient during Adam’s time, resulting in the rise of Cain and his descendants, and that divine laws needed to be updated or expanded over time. This argument reveals a misunderstanding of the nature of God’s law. According to Scripture, God’s law is eternal and unchanging (Psalm 119:89), and it was given to humanity from the very beginning. The Bible tells us that Adam and Eve were given a clear command in the Garden of Eden (Genesis 2:16-17), and the first murder, committed by Cain, was a direct violation of God’s command (Genesis 4:8).
The assertion that divine law needed to evolve contradicts the biblical truth that God’s moral law is eternal and sufficient for all time. The idea that God’s law was somehow inadequate until the time of Moses (or beyond) is not supported by the Bible. The Ahmadi leader’s failure to recognize the unchanging nature of God’s moral law exposes a deep ignorance of Scripture.
5. The False Claim About Incest and Permissibility in Adam’s Time
The Ahmadi leader argues that Adam and Eve’s children had to engage in incest to populate the Earth, claiming that there was nothing forbidden in the early human race. This idea contradicts both biblical narrative and sound theological reasoning. The Bible states that Adam and Eve had sons and daughters (Genesis 5:4), but it does not suggest that incest was the only way to propagate humanity. The Bible also makes it clear that incestuous relationships became forbidden in later Scripture, especially under the Mosaic Law (Leviticus 18:6-18), which was given long after the time of Adam and Eve.
By presenting incest as “permissible” in the early days of humanity, the Ahmadi leader overlooks the distinction between historical necessity and divine law. Early human relationships were governed by God’s providence, but as humanity grew, divine law was given to protect the sanctity of relationships and prevent sin from spreading. The Ahmadi leader’s failure to understand this biblical principle further exposes his ignorance of the Bible’s moral teachings.
6. Prophecy and the Passing of the Will: A Misapplication of Biblical Themes
The Ahmadi leader claims that Seth passed down a “Will” to his descendants, prophesying the coming of Noah. This concept of a secret, familial transmission of prophecies is not supported by Scripture. The Bible teaches that Noah’s prophetic role was directly initiated by God (Genesis 6:9–22), not as part of a family tradition passed down secretly. The Bible is clear that God’s revelation is direct and authoritative, not confined to hidden traditions or familial secrets.
The Ahmadi leader’s use of this concept reflects an attempt to align the cult’s teachings with Islamic notions of secret knowledge (taqiyah), which are foreign to the biblical worldview. Christianity teaches that God’s revelation is public and clear, culminating in the person of Jesus Christ (Hebrews 1:1–2). The misapplication of biblical prophecy in the Ahmadi teachings shows a profound misunderstanding of the nature of divine revelation.
The theological claims of the Ahmadi Religion of Peace and Light, especially those put forth by figures like Abdullah Hashem Aba Al-Sadiq and Imam Ahmed Al-Hassan, are fraught with errors, misinterpretations, and outright ignorance of biblical text. Their reinterpretation of Adam’s fall, the forbidden tree, original sin, divine law, and prophecy fails to align with Scripture and undermines essential Christian doctrines.
This theological weakness exposes the cult’s teachings as inconsistent with the Bible, highlighting the need for a strong biblical refutation. Christians must reject these distortions and reaffirm the biblical understanding of the Fall, divine law, and salvation. The Ahmadi leader’s ignorance of biblical teachings not only weakens his theological claims but also puts his followers at risk of embracing a false and dangerous understanding of God’s Word.